Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have an opinion on Secrets #21629

Open
crenshaw-dev opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #21631
Open

Have an opinion on Secrets #21629

crenshaw-dev opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #21631
Labels
component:docs enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@crenshaw-dev
Copy link
Member

Summary

Our docs currently state that we're unopinionated about secret management. The ecosystem has evolved to the point where we should have an opinion.

Motivation

Supporting less-than-ideal secret management practices is 1) costing tech debt and 2) reinforcing anti-patterns. We should work on reversing both of those.

Proposal

Update the docs to state that our opinion is that 1) you shouldn't inject secrets via hydration, and 2) you should use an on-destination-cluster secrets operator.

@crenshaw-dev crenshaw-dev added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2025
@crenshaw-dev crenshaw-dev added this to the v3.0 milestone Jan 22, 2025
crenshaw-dev added a commit to crenshaw-dev/argo-cd that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:docs enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants