Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not fail if downloaded file has good checksum but incorrect size. #2739

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

cmaglie
Copy link
Member

@cmaglie cmaglie commented Oct 28, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

See how to contribute

  • The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
    before creating one)
  • The PR follows
    our contributing guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
  • configuration.schema.json updated if new parameters are added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

As requested in #2332

Do not error if the downloaded file size doesn't match the size value in the index.
🙂 Users will no longer suffer when package developers fail to correctly set a size value.

What is the current behavior?

If a downloaded file has an incorrect size written in the index (but a correct checksum), it will fail to download.

What is the new behavior?

If a downloaded file has an incorrect size written in the index (but a correct checksum), it will download successfully.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?

No

Other information

Fix #2332

@cmaglie cmaglie self-assigned this Oct 28, 2024
@cmaglie cmaglie added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: code Related to content of the project itself labels Oct 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.63%. Comparing base (2dcee40) to head (ea7391f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/arduino/resources/checksums.go 50.00% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2739      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.63%   67.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         237      237              
  Lines       22356    22354       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        15121    15119       -2     
  Misses       6046     6046              
  Partials     1189     1189              
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 67.63% <50.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cmaglie cmaglie merged commit 7ee4cf7 into arduino:master Oct 28, 2024
98 checks passed
@cmaglie cmaglie deleted the no-fail-on-incorrect-download-size branch October 28, 2024 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Don't fail installation on mismatch with size fields of index
2 participants