Tag CMS signer identifier implicitly #218
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks like a little formatting needs to be cleaned up, but otherwise this patch looks great! |
|
@Lukasa Thanks for the prompt review! I've cleaned up the formatting |
Lukasa
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As pointed out in #203, the SignerIdentifier in PKCS#7 CMS should be implicitly tagged while the currently swift-certificates explicitly tags it. This PR contains changes for SignerIdentifier of SubjectKeyIdentifier type to be implicitly tagged.
RFC 5652 § 12.1:
Resolves: #203