Small changes for BuildKit support #173
Open
+5
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
end request in hijack mode
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I would like to tackle BuildKit support in dockerode. That required some small changes in docker-modem, because the connection needs to be hijacked to create a session.
The first change (preverse
Upgradeheader) should be safe.I am uncertain about the second change (ending the request in hijack mode). The tests still pass, but could this have other unintended side effects? To open a session over the docker api, this is needed - otherwise the
upgradeevent is never emittet. But we could allow this to be configured some other way as well.