-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
【ISSUE #133】RocketMQ-Operator support the rocketmq-5.0 proxy node for cluster pattern #134
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…q-operator into feature_proxy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that ClusterRole
for proxy
is missing.
// INSERT ADDITIONAL SPEC FIELDS - desired state of cluster | ||
// Important: Run "operator-sdk generate k8s" to regenerate code after modifying this file | ||
// Add custom validation using kubebuilder tags: https://book-v1.book.kubebuilder.io/beyond_basics/generating_crd.html | ||
ProxyStatefulSet v1.StatefulSet `json:"proxyStatefulSet"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Proxy is stateless, so is deployment
more appropriate than statefulset
?
Furthermore, it would be more elegant that users should only provide configs which they care about, instead of providing the whole statefulset
or deployment
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok
How is it going? Can you merge it? @shendongsd |
What is the purpose of the change
ISSUE #133RocketMQ-Operator support the rocketmq-5.0 proxy node for cluster pattern
And I will add local pattern later