Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-45357: [C++] Disable Flight test #45232

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

Conversation

lidavidm
Copy link
Member

@lidavidm lidavidm commented Jan 13, 2025

Rationale for this change

See #45120

What changes are included in this PR?

Disable pointless test

Are these changes tested?

N/A

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member Author

The failing test is #45235

@lidavidm lidavidm marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 07:07
@h-vetinari
Copy link
Contributor

Not crucial, but since 19.0.1 is now happening, it'd be nice to backport this patch, as we cannot do without in conda-forge (though it's not a big hassle to keep carrying it either, but I always try to reduce the patches we carry). CC @amoeba

Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the flakiness happening on all OS's and architectures? if not we could target disabling it only on the flaky ones.
I am ok to merge disabling this test as is and improve a more targeted disable as a follow up issue.

cpp/src/arrow/flight/test_definitions.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting review Awaiting review awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jan 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting review Awaiting review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review awaiting changes Awaiting changes labels Jan 27, 2025
@raulcd raulcd changed the title MINOR: [C++] Disable Flight test GH-45357: [C++] Disable Flight test Jan 27, 2025
Copy link

⚠️ GitHub issue #45357 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@raulcd raulcd merged commit 14e45a2 into apache:main Jan 27, 2025
38 checks passed
@raulcd raulcd removed the awaiting review Awaiting review label Jan 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Jan 27, 2025
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 14e45a2.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 7 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

lriggs pushed a commit to lriggs/arrow that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
### Rationale for this change

See apache#45120

### What changes are included in this PR?
Disable pointless test

### Are these changes tested?

N/A

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No
* GitHub Issue: apache#45357

Lead-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
### Rationale for this change

See #45120

### What changes are included in this PR?
Disable pointless test

### Are these changes tested?

N/A

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No
* GitHub Issue: #45357

Lead-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
amoeba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
### Rationale for this change

See #45120

### What changes are included in this PR?
Disable pointless test

### Are these changes tested?

N/A

### Are there any user-facing changes?
No
* GitHub Issue: #45357

Lead-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants