[signature] Reflect integration methods & SDK v5 influence; Leverage v4 & v5 SDK tabs

[dimim]

Related issues

• Jira issue link:
• GitHub issue link:

Changes

Required translations

Platform	ZH	JA	KO
iOS	✅	✅	✅
Android	✅	✅	✅
Unity	✅	✅	✅
React Native	✅	❌	✅
Flutter	✅	✅	✅
Cordova	✅	✅	✅
Cocos2d-x	✅	❌	❌
Unreal Engine	✅	✅	✅
Adobe Air	✅	❌	❌
Corona	✅	❌	❌
Xamarin	✅	❌	❌
iOS Adobe extension	✅	❌	❌
Android Adobe extension	✅	❌	❌

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
dev-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 23, 2025 2:41pm

[rscloura]

Hi @dimim. I have gone through the changes and I agree with everything. However, I do believe this is a good chance to make the pages easier to use, and really take advantage of the fact that there are two separate tabs, for SDK v4 and SDK v5, respectively. My comments mostly deal with changing some wording in order to make the pages specific to v4/v5, and minimise confusion. I realise this is not entirely the purpose of the present ticket, but the changes are small, and it's a good chance.

Most comments are of the form "Analogous comments apply", to act as reminders. The suggestion is the same, modulo obvious changes, as the first instance of the relevant comment.

[dimim]

Hi @dimim. I have gone through the changes and I agree with everything. [...]

Thanks, @rscloura -- some strong points shared. Please check the inline comments & LMK if I missed anything. The separate comments were helpful, as I was double checking while going through the review (hence the last force push).

Our internal ticket was also updated to reflect the extra changes & I grabbed the chance to update the resources (Android & iOS), as discussed.

Happy for thoughts.

[rscloura]

Thank you for the changes, and in particular for going through the trouble of updating the screenshots. They look much better. All good from my end!

[dimim]

Rebased with master. No other changes were done.