PC-776: New page to support users with non-participating LA

[Glenn-Clarke]

Added new page to user journey to support users whose local authority is not participating in sign ups through this service.

The new page captures users who select a local luthority with a HUG2 status of "not participating"
While it currently shows default text, this includes a mechanism to show custom text unique to a local authority.

(Aberdeenshire Council shown for testing purposes. List of LA's in "not participating" has not been changed currently)

[Glenn-Clarke]

@jamiehumphries Is the viewbag.title acceptable? It wasn't confirmed on the Jira ticket, so I've just brought across the same from NotTakingPart.cshtml

"Your local authority is not taking part"

[jamiehumphries]

@Glenn-Clarke, are you going to make the changes to the LocalAuthorityData separately to mark relevant ones as NotParticipating? I know there is still some discussion about Croydon.

[jamiehumphries]

@jamiehumphries Is the viewbag.title acceptable? It wasn't confirmed on the Jira ticket, so I've just brought across the same from NotTakingPart.cshtml

"Your local authority is not taking part"

Thanks for checking this. I think we should use the h1 header from the page, i.e.

Your Local Authority is not receiving applications via this service

I have added a not to PC-776 to confirm.

[Glenn-Clarke]

@Glenn-Clarke, are you going to make the changes to the LocalAuthorityData separately to mark relevant ones as NotParticipating? I know there is still some discussion about Croydon.

I've got the changes locally, but I've been holding off on them until confirmation. Would you like me to make them all excluding Croydon, and we can make a separate change to Croydon (or not) once we have confirmation?

[jamiehumphries]

I've got the changes locally, but I've been holding off on them until confirmation. Would you like me to make them all excluding Croydon, and we can make a separate change to Croydon (or not) once we have confirmation?

I think let's make them all including Croydon, as I think the most likely scenario is that they should be NotParticipating.

We can adjust afterwards, as necessary.

[Glenn-Clarke]

I've got the changes locally, but I've been holding off on them until confirmation. Would you like me to make them all excluding Croydon, and we can make a separate change to Croydon (or not) once we have confirmation?

I think let's make them all including Croydon, as I think the most likely scenario is that they should be NotParticipating.

We can adjust afterwards, as necessary.

Done :)

[jamiehumphries]

Markups look good! Go ahead and merge to develop.