Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

[WEAV-152] 미팅 팀 도메인 구현 #52

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2024
Merged

[WEAV-152] 미팅 팀 도메인 구현 #52

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2024

Conversation

waterfogSW
Copy link
Member

@waterfogSW waterfogSW commented Feb 3, 2024

구현사항

미팅팀 도메인 구현

이슈

  • value class가 controller에서 초기화 될때 validation이 안되는것같아요

@waterfogSW waterfogSW added the feat New feature or request label Feb 3, 2024
@waterfogSW waterfogSW self-assigned this Feb 3, 2024
@waterfogSW waterfogSW requested a review from dojinyou as a code owner February 3, 2024 10:53
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
package com.studentcenter.weave.domain.meeting.enums

enum class TeamType(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

p3) 이부분은 팀 타입보다 멤버의 수? 같은 개념이 더 직관적인 것 같은데 어떠세요?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

음 이건 피그마 상으로
image
이런식으로 멤버수보다는 미팅 종류가 정해져있어서, 멤버수로하면 오히려 더 모호할것 같더라구요.

숫자로하면 1명도 되나? 5명도 되나? 이렇게 고민 될거같아서

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

음, 피그마 상으로 그런데 정책적으로 필요하면 숫자는 제한하면 될 것 같구요!
화면은 바뀔 수 있는거니까 개념적으로 접근하는게 좋다고 생각했어요!
만약에, 3:33명이라는 표현으로 바뀐다고 저희 내부적인 enum 타입이 변경되면 안될 것 같아서요!

@waterfogSW waterfogSW requested a review from dojinyou February 3, 2024 13:13
@waterfogSW waterfogSW enabled auto-merge (squash) February 3, 2024 13:59
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 3, 2024

@waterfogSW waterfogSW merged commit 6fd9a7f into main Feb 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@waterfogSW waterfogSW deleted the feat/WEAV-152 branch February 3, 2024 14:06
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feat New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants