equivalent constructs at elaboration time/hardware/sim

[numero-744]

No description provided.

[numero-744]

@Readon

What do you think of this?

https://sublime-and-sphinx-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/code_blocks.html#code-examples-in-multiple-languages

Maybe do the same thing for VHDL vs SystemVerilog vs SpinalHDL?

[Readon]

that would be great if there are SpinalHDL/Verilog/SystemVerilog/VHDL，user can easily compare and study by that. However, it's necessary to make that happen.

…

---Original--- From: ***@***.***> Date: Thu, Nov 17, 2022 00:29 AM To: ***@***.***>; Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>; Subject: Re: [SpinalHDL/SpinalDoc-RTD] equivalent constructs at elaborationtime/hardware/sim (Issue #145) @Readon What do you think of this? https://sublime-and-sphinx-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/code_blocks.html#code-examples-in-multiple-languages Maybe do the same thing for VHDL vs SystemVerilog vs SpinalHDL? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[numero-744]

However, it's necessary to make that happen.

@Readon I'm focusing on RTD for the next 2 weeks, we'll see what it gives ^^

I wanted a big rework of RTD, I have started this morning. I'm waiting for other PRs to be merged (automated code checks and pdf generation in GH workflow) before I publish a PR.

After this I'll address RTD issues like this one.

[Dolu1990]

Can be fancy :D

[numero-744]

Ooops svx/sphinxcontrib-osexample#8