Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: deprecate from field from Email Bridge #33713

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tapiarafael
Copy link
Member

@tapiarafael tapiarafael commented Oct 22, 2024

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Deprecates the from field from the apps.engine Email bridge to avoid misuse. Also, cloud workspaces require to have the from the same as defined in the settings, so we will get the value defined in the From_Email setting by default.

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

  • This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label
  • This PR is missing the required milestone or project

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: bf4b271

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 34 packages
Name Type
@rocket.chat/meteor Patch
@rocket.chat/apps-engine Patch
@rocket.chat/apps Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer Patch
@rocket.chat/presence Patch
rocketchat-services Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client Patch
@rocket.chat/cron Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client Patch
@rocket.chat/freeswitch Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service Patch
@rocket.chat/license Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/network-broker Patch
@rocket.chat/models Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
🚀 Deployed preview to https://RocketChat.github.io/Rocket.Chat/pr-preview/pr-33713/
on branch gh-pages at 2024-10-22 20:22 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.01%. Comparing base (2aaf64d) to head (bf4b271).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #33713   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    75.01%   75.01%           
========================================
  Files          480      480           
  Lines        21000    21000           
  Branches      5329     5329           
========================================
  Hits         15754    15754           
  Misses        4619     4619           
  Partials       627      627           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 75.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@tapiarafael tapiarafael marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 21:44
@tapiarafael tapiarafael requested a review from a team as a code owner October 22, 2024 21:44
Comment on lines +14 to +18
let { from } = email;
if (!from) {
this.orch.debugLog(`The app ${appId} didn't provide a from address, using the default one.`);
from = String(settings.get('From_Email'));
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would have gone with the good old email.from validation and assignment here, but you do you 😂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants