-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
add podcast as "video" link + fix date to 2025 + fix URLs
- Loading branch information
1 parent
d8fc02b
commit b6d2ecc
Showing
6 changed files
with
16 additions
and
12 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
@article{makowski2025toobeautiful, | ||
title = {Too beautiful to be fake: Attractive faces are less likely to be judged as artificially generated}, | ||
journal = {Acta Psychologica}, | ||
volume = {252}, | ||
pages = {104670}, | ||
year = {2025}, | ||
issn = {0001-6918}, | ||
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104670}, | ||
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824005481}, | ||
author = {Dominique Makowski and An Shu Te and Ana Neves and Stephanie Kirk and Ngoi Zi Liang and Panagiotis Mavros and S.H. Annabel Chen}, | ||
keywords = {Attractiveness, AI-generated images, Fiction, Fake news, Sense of reality}, | ||
abstract = {Technological advances render the distinction between artificial (e.g., computer-generated faces) and real stimuli increasingly difficult, yet the factors driving our beliefs regarding the nature of ambiguous stimuli remain largely unknown. In this study, 150 participants rated 109 pictures of faces on 4 characteristics (attractiveness, beauty, trustworthiness, familiarity). The stimuli were then presented again with the new information that some of them were AI-generated, and participants had to rate each image according to whether they believed them to be real or fake. Despite all images being pictures of real faces from the same database, most participants did indeed rate a large portion of them as ‘fake’ (often with high confidence), with strong intra- and inter-individual variability. Our results suggest a gender-dependent role of attractiveness on reality judgements, with faces rated as more attractive being classified as more real. We also report links between reality beliefs tendencies and dispositional traits such as narcissism and paranoid ideation.} | ||
} |
File renamed without changes
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.