Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abandon loop in exog process creation #96

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

Abandon loop in exog process creation #96

merged 11 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

MaxBlesch
Copy link
Member

@MaxBlesch MaxBlesch commented Mar 11, 2024

Polishing and speedup.

  • Refactor likelihood
  • Refactor state space creation and remove for-loop around exogenous processes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2146513) to head (fbbbb7e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #96   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           22        22           
  Lines          870       871    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits           870       871    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@segsell segsell changed the title Abandoned loop in exog process creation Abandon loop in exog process creation Mar 13, 2024
@segsell segsell self-requested a review March 13, 2024 08:31
Copy link
Member

@segsell segsell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!!

@segsell segsell merged commit 1698f8f into main Mar 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@segsell segsell deleted the corrected_exog branch March 13, 2024 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants