Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds support for the DUMPCUPL keyword #4276

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hakonhagland
Copy link
Contributor

Builds on #4272 which should be merged first.

Adds support for the DUMPCUPL keyword in reservoir coupling.

@hakonhagland
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins build this opm-simulators=5620 please

@bska
Copy link
Member

bska commented Oct 23, 2024

Builds on #4272 which should be merged first.

Okay. In that case I'll set the PR to draft state in order to avoid inadvertently merging the work before the upstream PR is in the master sources.

Copy link
Member

@blattms blattms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just the usual nitpicks

opm/input/eclipse/Schedule/ResCoup/CouplingFile.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hakonhagland hakonhagland marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2025 07:35
@hakonhagland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blattms Thanks for the review. I have added two commits to address the comments.

@hakonhagland
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins build this opm-simulators=5620 please

@blattms
Copy link
Member

blattms commented Jan 15, 2025

did build with companion PR in opm-simulators, trying without.

@blattms
Copy link
Member

blattms commented Jan 15, 2025

jenkins build this please

@blattms blattms merged commit 138ab35 into OPM:master Jan 15, 2025
1 check passed
@blattms
Copy link
Member

blattms commented Jan 15, 2025

Thanks a lot for the changes and the work in total.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants