describe tee.bin and tee-raw.bin in the porting guidelines

[calebccff]

For someone just trying to launch OP-TEE and print "Hello World!",
tee.bin seems like the obvious binary to use. However it contains a
non-executable header(?!) which can cause some lost days of debugging.

Add a mention that tee-raw.bin should be used as it can just be jumped
to.

cc @jenswi-linaro

[jenswi-linaro]

For the commit "architecutre: porting: drop defunct thread handles from main.c":
s/architecutre/architecture/
With that fixed, please apply:
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <[email protected]>

I appreciate the initiative with "architecutre: porting: describe tee.bin and tee-raw.bin", but we should describe all the produced binaries. I can attempt that, so please drop the commit.

[etienne-lms]

For commit "architecutre: porting: drop defunct thread handles from main.c":
Acked-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]> with @jenswi-linaro comment addressed + prefer replace pm_stub with explicit pm_stub.h in commit message. Note that generic_boot.h and other resources define in the code example neither exists since a few release tags. Maybe simpler to state in the commit message that the change is intended to "Update proting description since many resources are deprecated since at least release tag 3.10.0".

[jbech-linaro]

@calebccff @jenswi-linaro , will we abandon this, since we have merged the other PR from Jens that explains binaries better?

[jenswi-linaro]

We want the first commit, "architecutre: porting: drop defunct thread handles from main.c".

[jbech-linaro]

Alright, makes sense, @calebccff , can you remove the second commit, rebase, add Jens and Etiennes tags and force push to your branch? When done, I will merge it.