-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rename solidity_testing_smoke
to solidity_testing_sanctuary
#616
Merged
OmarTawfik
merged 2 commits into
NomicFoundation:main
from
OmarTawfik-forks:rename-smoke-tests
Oct 23, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
[build] | ||
# This crate builds and runs in release mode. | ||
# Let's use a separate target-dir "$THIS_CRATE/target" to avoid invalidating the workspace-level cache. | ||
target-dir = "./target" |
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
crates/solidity/testing/smoke/Cargo.toml → crates/solidity/testing/sanctuary/Cargo.toml
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
optional style nit - I find that 'everything is an expression' in Rust helps simplify the code in many places, this could just be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really like that
return
is optional in Rust. It is an important keyword in almost all programming languages that describe exactly whether the expression on the right hand side results in a value or()
/void
. It is very useful when reading statements left to right to understand the context as the reader's eye is moving.It is less of an issue in a tiny function like this, but in more complex ones, it is much more important, especially with multiple match cases or if branches.
If it is possible, I would have hoped to enforce it everywhere. Saving the few extra keystrokes is just not worth it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am going to 100% disagree here. Rust is an expression-oriented language, so eliding the
return
statement is quite natural. I prefer it unless there are early returns, which I don't like in any case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, I'd have to go with the prevalent code style that's used in Rust. In complex code with early return it's needed to use the return statement but for majority of cases I find that eliding the statement is more natural. I would optimize for the more common case and for familiarity/ease of onboarding other Rust devs here.
We should enable and enforce Clippy at some point and call it a day 👍