Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New ONTAP: Workload graph needs qos-detail and -node filter #2095

Closed
MrObvious opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2099 or #2100
Closed

New ONTAP: Workload graph needs qos-detail and -node filter #2095

MrObvious opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2099 or #2100
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@MrObvious
Copy link

The new graph is great. However I missed when reviewing the fact that there is no "Node" dropdown. Also internal workload names in qos-detail are not available.

[8:53 AM]Rahul: checked. We only collect user_defined workload in Harvest. This is system_defined
[8:53 AM]Rahul: Please open an issue and we'll get that in asap.

See more here: https://discord.com/channels/855068651522490400/1108129448978554922

@MrObvious MrObvious added the feature New feature or request label May 17, 2023
@rahulguptajss rahulguptajss self-assigned this May 18, 2023
@rahulguptajss rahulguptajss linked a pull request May 19, 2023 that will close this issue
@rahulguptajss
Copy link
Contributor

rahulguptajss commented May 22, 2023

  • Add system_defined workload counters
  • Merge workload and workload volume panels in workload dashboard
  • Add node level workload counters

@rahulguptajss
Copy link
Contributor

rahulguptajss commented Sep 29, 2023

Moving out of 23.11.

As part of this, we have added system_defined workload counters and enhanced workload dashboard with new panels. After investigation, we've determined that implementing node level workload counters would impose a substantial load on both ONTAP and Harvest. Given the potential impact, we've decided to hold off on this implementation for the time being.
We're interested in hearing from other customers who might find this feature useful. We'll keep the issue open for customers to express their support.

@cgrinds
Copy link
Collaborator

cgrinds commented Nov 15, 2023

Closing based on @rahulguptajss last comment

@cgrinds cgrinds closed this as completed Nov 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
3 participants