Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Python 3.13 #227
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Support Python 3.13 #227
Changes from 9 commits
d3434ce
66a57b3
e7fb4f3
216c5e2
38472c9
d37e414
e999f88
2d5ccf3
63481d2
3b5e594
9010381
bd36f52
aaaf0ac
aee7b22
d6bc4fb
183b365
7402772
1fc04a8
ea6f854
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean for the default dataset the results in python 3.8-3.12 and 3.13 are different?
Do you have any idea why is this happening?
Probably the problem is not with the python itself, but with some of the dependencies?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the behavior of implicit ItemKNN changes due to the changes in the similarity matrix.
Considering the cosign similarity, co-occurrence between 11-14 and 11-15 are both 2 times, thus it causes flakiness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let us take some time to examine this case carefully
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@feldlime Do you need more time?
I think the original dataset can be a bit flaky because the cosine similarities for both two are the same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't have time to work on this, I'll take another 2-3 weeks