DataGridAggregate Questions

[He-Wu]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I need to display total under the selection box, but setting it is useless. abc is not a field where TItem exists. I only need to display the string total.According to the following code, it will not display the total string at the bottom of the checkbox

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. Include any alternative solutions you've considered.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

[David-Moreira]

The DataGridAggregate requires Field to be the same Field as the Column you want to put it under currently. There is currently no way to customize the DataGridAggregate under the command and multi select columns.

I believe providing a CommandColumnTemplate and MultiSelectColumnTemplate under the DataGridAggregate might be appropriate. Would you also agree @stsrki ?

But for now, your best would be to allocate the Total string under the Id column for example.

[stsrki]

At the moment, when we define DataGridAggregate with the Field name, it automatically know to which Field/Column needs to be placed. Without the Field defined, it would be quite problematic to determine where we need to place the DataGridAggregate cell. So to overcome that limitation we would most probably have to have multiple DataGridAggregates to be able to place the aggregate cell under the desired column. To me that sounds a bit strange.

[David-Moreira]

In this case I'm proposing two new templates for the command and multi select columns. Which is where the user is apparently trying to place the aggregate.

Nothing to do with DataGridAggregate and the Field. I think that should stay like that for now.

[stsrki]

I believe providing a CommandColumnTemplate and MultiSelectColumnTemplate under the DataGridAggregate might be appropriate. Would you also agree @stsrki ?

Yeah, but adding it under the DataGridAggregate would not make sense for the reasons I mentioned previously.

If we go the new template route, then I think adding it under the DataGridColumn(and other types) makes most sense. I would name it something along AggregateTemplate which would indicate by the naming where it would be placed. The AggregateTemplate would have the highest priority over the current DataGridAggregate rendering.

[David-Moreira]

OH yes, that's what I meant haha. I didn't explain the api correctly I guess.

Yes, To have the AgreggateTemplate in the CommandColumn and MultiSelectColumn.

I guess the template is also a nice addition to the column either way, although it can be redudant since the aggregate already has the display template.

[stsrki]

@David-Moreira, easy win for the 1.5?

[David-Moreira]

kk