Update todo.ejs #253
Update todo.ejs #253
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a modification to the header text in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
views/todo.ejs
Outdated
| @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ | |||
| </head> | |||
|
|
|||
| <body> | |||
| <h1>Hello Junoon Batch 8 (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1> | |||
| <h1>Hello Dosto, Junoon Batch 8 of (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider simplifying the header text structure
While adding "Dosto" makes the greeting more friendly, the text structure could be improved for better clarity.
Consider this simpler structure:
-<h1>Hello Dosto, Junoon Batch 8 of (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1>
+<h1>Hello Dosto! Junoon Batch 8 - Write your Jenkins Learning Plan</h1>This suggestion:
- Maintains the friendly greeting with "Dosto"
- Removes redundant Jenkins mentions
- Uses better punctuation
- Makes the purpose clearer
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <h1>Hello Dosto, Junoon Batch 8 of (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1> | |
| <h1>Hello Dosto! Junoon Batch 8 - Write your Jenkins Learning Plan</h1> |
|
merge it |
|
update todo.ejs |
|
merge this pull request |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
views/todo.ejs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
views/todo.ejs (1)
92-92: Consider simplifying the header text structure
The previous review suggestion for simplifying the header text structure remains valid.
| @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ | |||
| </head> | |||
|
|
|||
| <body> | |||
| <h1>Hello Junoon Batch 8 (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1> | |||
| <h1>Hello Dosto! Junoon Batch 8 of (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider semantic HTML structure for the page heading
The current heading serves as both a welcome message and task instruction. Consider splitting it into semantic components for better accessibility and clarity:
-<h1>Hello Dosto! Junoon Batch 8 of (Jenkins), Write your plan on Learning Jenkins</h1>
+<header>
+ <h1>Jenkins Learning Plan</h1>
+ <p class="welcome-text">Hello Dosto! Welcome Junoon Batch 8</p>
+</header>Add this CSS to maintain styling:
header {
background-color: #4CAF50;
color: white;
margin: 0;
padding: 20px;
text-align: center;
}
header h1 {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.welcome-text {
margin: 10px 0 0;
font-size: 1.1em;
}
| @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ version: '3.9' | |||
|
|
|||
| services: | |||
| web: | |||
| image: trainwithshubham/node-app:latest | |||
| image: shubhamkadam3798/node-app:latest | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using specific version tags instead of 'latest'
Using the latest tag in production is not recommended as it:
- Makes deployments non-deterministic
- Can lead to unexpected behavior when the image is updated
- Makes it difficult to rollback to previous versions
Consider using a specific version tag:
- image: shubhamkadam3798/node-app:latest
+ image: shubhamkadam3798/node-app:v1.0.0 # Replace with actual versionAlso, consider implementing a version pinning strategy in your CI/CD pipeline to ensure consistent deployments.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
💡 Codebase verification
Security concerns with Docker image change require attention
Based on the verification results:
- The new image
shubhamkadam3798/node-app:latestexists on Docker Hub and was recently pushed (November 2024) - The Dockerfile shows the image is built from
node:12.2.0-alpine, which is significantly outdated and may contain security vulnerabilities - No security scanning configurations are present in the repository
- The repository contains DevSecOps documentation suggesting security practices should be followed
Required actions:
- Update the base image to a newer LTS version of Node.js
- Implement container scanning using Trivy as mentioned in the DevSecOps documentation
- Add a specific version tag instead of using
latest - Document the security validation process for the new image
🔗 Analysis chain
Security verification needed for the new image source
The change switches the image from a known account (trainwithshubham) to a personal account (shubhamkadam3798). This introduces potential security risks.
Please provide:
- Justification for changing the image source
- Verification of the new image's security and authenticity
- Documentation of testing performed with the new image
Let's verify the new image details:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check image details and security information
# Check if the image exists and its details
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/shubhamkadam3798/node-app/tags"
# Check for any security advisories in the repository
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: DOCKER, package: "node-app") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1727
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository for any documentation about the image change
# and look for any security-related configurations
# Check for any documentation about Docker or deployment
fd -e md -e txt . -x grep -l -i "docker\|deploy\|image" {}
# Look for any security scanning configurations
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json . -x grep -l -i "security\|scan\|vulnerability" {}
# Check if there are any Dockerfile changes
fd Dockerfile
# Check the git history for the docker-compose.yaml file to understand the context
git log -n 5 --oneline docker-compose.yaml
Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Dockerfile and related documentation to understand the image build context
# Check the Dockerfile contents
cat Dockerfile
# Check README files for any documentation about the Docker image
cat README.md
cat kustomize/README.md
cat DevSecOps/README.md
# Check package.json for any security-related configurations
cat package.json
Length of output: 9870
Summary by CodeRabbit