Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix: remove failing test
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@wadealexc
wadealexc committed Dec 6, 2023
1 parent b4d2c1b commit bb24d61
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 120 deletions.
120 changes: 0 additions & 120 deletions src/test/DepositWithdraw.t.sol
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,126 +18,6 @@ contract DepositWithdrawTests is EigenLayerTestHelper {
return _testDepositWeth(getOperatorAddress(0), amountToDeposit);
}

function testWithdrawalSequences() public {
//use preexisting helper function to set up a withdrawal
address middleware = address(0xdeadbeef);
address middleware_2 = address(0x009849);
address staker = getOperatorAddress(0);
IDelegationManager.Withdrawal memory queuedWithdrawal;

uint256 depositAmount = 1 ether;
IStrategy strategy = wethStrat;
IERC20 underlyingToken = weth;
IStrategy[] memory strategyArray = new IStrategy[](1);
strategyArray[0] = strategy;
IERC20[] memory tokensArray = new IERC20[](1);
tokensArray[0] = underlyingToken;
{
uint256[] memory shareAmounts = new uint256[](1);
shareAmounts[0] = depositAmount - 1 gwei; //leave some shares behind so we don't get undelegation issues
uint256[] memory strategyIndexes = new uint256[](1);
strategyIndexes[0] = 0;
address withdrawer = staker;

{
assertTrue(!delegation.isDelegated(staker), "_createQueuedWithdrawal: staker is already delegated");
IDelegationManager.OperatorDetails memory operatorDetails = IDelegationManager.OperatorDetails({
earningsReceiver: staker,
delegationApprover: address(0),
stakerOptOutWindowBlocks: 0
});
_testRegisterAsOperator(staker, operatorDetails);
assertTrue(
delegation.isDelegated(staker), "_createQueuedWithdrawal: staker isn't delegated when they should be"
);

//make deposit in WETH strategy
uint256 amountDeposited = _testDepositWeth(staker, depositAmount);
// We can't withdraw more than we deposit
if (shareAmounts[0] > amountDeposited) {
cheats.expectRevert("StrategyManager._removeShares: shareAmount too high");
}
}


cheats.startPrank(staker);
//opt in staker to restake for the two middlewares we are using
slasher.optIntoSlashing(middleware);
slasher.optIntoSlashing(middleware_2);
cheats.stopPrank();

cheats.startPrank(middleware);
// first stake update with updateBlock = 1, serveUntilBlock = 5

uint32 serveUntilBlock = 5;
slasher.recordFirstStakeUpdate(staker, serveUntilBlock);
cheats.stopPrank();
//check middlewareTimes entry is correct
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexStalestUpdateBlock(staker, 0) == 1, "middleware updateBlock update incorrect");
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexServeUntilBlock(staker, 0) == 5, "middleware serveUntil update incorrect");


cheats.startPrank(middleware_2);
// first stake update with updateBlock = 1, serveUntilBlock = 6
slasher.recordFirstStakeUpdate(staker, serveUntilBlock+1);
cheats.stopPrank();
//check middlewareTimes entry is correct
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexStalestUpdateBlock(staker, 1) == 1, "middleware updateBlock update incorrect");
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexServeUntilBlock(staker, 1) == 6, "middleware serveUntil update incorrect");
//check old entry has not changed
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexStalestUpdateBlock(staker, 0) == 1, "middleware updateBlock update incorrect");
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexServeUntilBlock(staker, 0) == 5, "middleware serveUntil update incorrect");

//move ahead a block before queuing the withdrawal
cheats.roll(2);
//cheats.startPrank(staker);
//queue the withdrawal
( ,queuedWithdrawal) = _createOnlyQueuedWithdrawal(staker,
true,
depositAmount,
strategyArray,
tokensArray,
shareAmounts,
strategyIndexes,
withdrawer
);

}
//Because the staker has queued a withdrawal both currently staked middlewares must issued an update as required for the completion of the withdrawal
//to be realistic we move ahead a block before updating middlewares
cheats.roll(3);

cheats.startPrank(middleware);
// stake update with updateBlock = 3, newServeUntilBlock = 7
uint32 newServeUntilBlock = 7;
uint32 updateBlock = 3;
uint256 insertAfter = 1;
slasher.recordStakeUpdate(staker, updateBlock, newServeUntilBlock, insertAfter);
cheats.stopPrank();
//check middlewareTimes entry is correct
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexStalestUpdateBlock(staker, 2) == 1, "middleware updateBlock update incorrect");
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexServeUntilBlock(staker, 2) == 7, "middleware serveUntil update incorrect");

cheats.startPrank(middleware_2);
// stake update with updateBlock = 3, newServeUntilBlock = 10
slasher.recordStakeUpdate(staker, updateBlock, newServeUntilBlock+3, insertAfter);
cheats.stopPrank();
//check middlewareTimes entry is correct
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexStalestUpdateBlock(staker, 3) == 3, "middleware updateBlock update incorrect");
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexServeUntilBlock(staker, 3) == 10, "middleware serveUntil update incorrect");

cheats.startPrank(middleware);
// stake update with updateBlock = 3, newServeUntilBlock = 7
newServeUntilBlock = 7;
updateBlock = 3;
insertAfter = 2;
slasher.recordStakeUpdate(staker, updateBlock, newServeUntilBlock, insertAfter);
cheats.stopPrank();
//check middlewareTimes entry is correct
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexStalestUpdateBlock(staker, 4) == 3, "middleware updateBlock update incorrect");
require(slasher.getMiddlewareTimesIndexServeUntilBlock(staker, 4) == 10, "middleware serveUntil update incorrect");
}


/// @notice deploys 'numStratsToAdd' strategies using '_testAddStrategy' and then deposits '1e18' to each of them from 'getOperatorAddress(0)'
/// @param numStratsToAdd is the number of strategies being added and deposited into
Expand Down

0 comments on commit bb24d61

Please sign in to comment.