Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add debug setup for inference server & worker #3575

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

0xfacade
Copy link
Contributor

@0xfacade 0xfacade commented Jul 16, 2023

I couldn't find an existing way to attach a debugger to the inference server or worker. In this PR, I enable both to be debugged using debugpy, the Python debugger that integrates easily with VS Code.

Open issues:

  • add documentation
  • test once more
  • run pre-commit (still having issues with the setup)

@github-actions
Copy link

pre-commit failed.
Please run pre-commit run --all-files locally and commit the changes.
Find more information in the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -231,12 +231,14 @@ services:
TRUSTED_CLIENT_KEYS: "6969"
ALLOW_DEBUG_AUTH: "True"
API_ROOT: "http://localhost:8000"
DEBUG: "True"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I understand correctly, the compose file is only meant for local development, so setting this here shouldn't be a problem?

"request": "attach",
"connect": {
"host": "localhost",
"port": 5679
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note the different ports for server and worker

# Uncomment to wait here until a debugger is attached
# debugpy.wait_for_client()

uvicorn.run("main:app", host="0.0.0.0", port=port, reload=is_debug)
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xfacade 0xfacade Jul 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This method of starting the server is only used for development - the docker image for production still invokes the uvicorn command. I could change that to also use python main.py instead for consistency, if desired.

@github-actions
Copy link

pre-commit failed.
Please run pre-commit run --all-files locally and commit the changes.
Find more information in the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2023

pre-commit failed.
Please run pre-commit run --all-files locally and commit the changes.
Find more information in the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
exclude: build|stubs|^bot/templates/$|openassistant/templates|docs/docs/api/openapi.json|scripts/postprocessing/regex_pii_detector.py

default_language_version:
python: python3
python: python3.10
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@olliestanley This is what was causing pre-commit to fail on my machine. python3 is interpreted as python3.7, which is not new enough for some of the syntax, or isort. When I am more specific, like here, it works. Should this be examined some more?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suspect this wouldn't be an issue if you ran the commands from inside a Python 3.10 virtual environment (I guess that's why others haven't had any similar issues) but I don't see any reason we can't make this config change if it helps make things easier

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm on a rolling release Linux system with Python 3.10.10. It worked correctly inside a Ubuntu Docker container with the same Python version.. so it's probably some other dependency that broke this

@0xfacade
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xfacade commented Aug 2, 2023

@olliestanley From my side, this is ready to be merged, now that I've figured out why pre-commit was failing (see other message).

@olliestanley
Copy link
Collaborator

olliestanley commented Aug 3, 2023

@olliestanley From my side, this is ready to be merged, now that I've figured out why pre-commit was failing (see other message).

I'm happy for it to be merged but it touches repo root files etc so will need approval from @andreaskoepf or @yk

If one of them is reading this - would also be good to get Florian collaborator access to the repo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants