Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_memory_commands extension #1065

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: array_command_update
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EwanC
Copy link
Contributor

@EwanC EwanC commented Feb 21, 2024

See #1066

The goal of this extension is to be able to update the parameters to memory operation commands in a command-buffer after the command-buffer has been finalized using the clUpdateMutableCommandsKHR entry-point defined by cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_dispatch.

@EwanC EwanC added the cl_khr_command_buffer Relating to the command-buffer family of extension label Feb 21, 2024
@EwanC EwanC force-pushed the array_command_update branch 3 times, most recently from 62e7b7d to 2673582 Compare March 28, 2024 18:11
@EwanC EwanC force-pushed the cl_khr_mutable_memory_commands branch from 82576f1 to c2e3f79 Compare March 28, 2024 18:23
Draft of `cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_memory_commands` based
ontop of KhronosGroup#1045
which updates `clUpdateMutableCommandsKHR` to pass configs
by an array rather than linked list.

The goal of this extension is to be able to update the parameters to memory
operation commands in a command-buffer after the command-buffer has been
finalized using the `clUpdateMutableCommandsKHR` entry-point defined by
`cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_dispatch`.
@EwanC EwanC force-pushed the cl_khr_mutable_memory_commands branch from c2e3f79 to 088995d Compare March 29, 2024 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cl_khr_command_buffer Relating to the command-buffer family of extension
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants