-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kwxm/multi cost model benchmark test #6063
Conversation
/benchmark validation |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
/benchmark nofib |
/benchmark bls12-381-benchmarks |
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5ee29364a' (base) and 'd0ca303ad' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'nofib' on '5ee29364a' (base) and 'd0ca303ad' (PR) Results table
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
Comparing benchmark results of 'bls12-381-benchmarks' on '5ee29364a' (base) and 'd0ca303ad' (PR) Results table
|
OK, that looks good. |
DON'T REVIEW THIS OR MERGE IT!
There's an imminent PR to update the cost modelling machinery to handle multiple cost models. The default cost model used for testing/benchmarking is now the provisional Conway cost model, which updates the costs of many things. I want to check some stuff using the old cost model with the new machinery though, and that's what this is for.