Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix UI bug when customizing intervention map style (#3800) #3807

Merged

Conversation

njourdane
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The path style of an intervention can now be customized without affecting its behavior on the map.

Related Issue

#3800

Checklist

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Oct 23, 2023

Passing run #7453 ↗︎

0 24 0 0 Flakiness 0

Details:

Merge 39efce0 into 56db43f...
Project: Geotrek-admin Commit: f2c3f6b8e4 ℹ️
Status: Passed Duration: 05:56 💡
Started: Oct 23, 2023 12:53 PM Ended: Oct 23, 2023 12:59 PM

Review all test suite changes for PR #3807 ↗︎

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (56db43f) 98.33% compared to head (39efce0) 98.33%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3807   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.33%   98.33%           
=======================================
  Files         292      292           
  Lines       21816    21816           
=======================================
  Hits        21453    21453           
  Misses        363      363           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Chatewgne
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for finding this fix !

@Chatewgne Chatewgne merged commit d5bb384 into GeotrekCE:master Nov 3, 2023
14 checks passed
@babastienne babastienne changed the title 🐛 [Bug fixes] fix UI bug when customizing intervention map style (#3800) Fix UI bug when customizing intervention map style (#3800) Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants