Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename SRC-7 to Onchain Native Asset Metadata Standard #157

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

bitzoic
Copy link
Member

@bitzoic bitzoic commented Oct 23, 2024

Type of change

  • Improvement (refactoring, restructuring repository, cleaning tech debt, ...)

Changes

The following changes have been made:

  • Updates the SRC-7 naming from "Arbitrary Native Asset Metadata" to "Onchain Native Asset Metadata"
  • Adds comments on the stateful intent of the standard.

Notes

Checklist

  • I have linked to any relevant issues.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book).
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary Breaking* or New Feature labels where relevant.
  • I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards.
  • I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
  • I have updated the changelog to reflect the changes on this PR.

@bitzoic bitzoic added the SRC-7 Label used to filter for the standard issue label Oct 23, 2024
@bitzoic bitzoic self-assigned this Oct 23, 2024
@bitzoic bitzoic requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 06:56
@K1-R1 K1-R1 requested a review from a team October 23, 2024 07:09
@bitzoic bitzoic merged commit c53ef03 into master Oct 28, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
SRC-7 Label used to filter for the standard issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants