Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: ABI gen (without CLI) #3249

Draft
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: ns/feat/abi-parser
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: ABI gen (without CLI) #3249

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

petertonysmith94
Copy link
Contributor

@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 commented Oct 4, 2024 •
edited by fuel-service-user
Loading

Summary

  • TBD

Checklist

  • All changes are covered by tests (or not applicable)
  • All changes are documented (or not applicable)
  • I reviewed the entire PR myself (preferably, on GH UI)
  • I described all Breaking Changes (or there's none)

@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 added the feat Issue is a feature label Oct 4, 2024
@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
fuels-template ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 24, 2024 8:16am
ts-api-docs ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 24, 2024 8:16am
ts-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 24, 2024 8:16am
ts-docs-api ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 24, 2024 8:16am

@codspeed-hq CodSpeed HQ
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3249 will improve performances by 55.98%

Comparing ns/feat/abi-typegen (f521590) with ns/feat/abi-parser (916bb90)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
✅ 17 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark ns/feat/abi-parser ns/feat/abi-typegen Change
⚡ should successfully conduct a custom transfer between wallets (x20 times) 76.6 ms 49.1 ms +55.98%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@digorithm digorithm Awaiting requested review from digorithm digorithm will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review digorithm is a code owner

@arboleya arboleya Awaiting requested review from arboleya arboleya will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review arboleya is a code owner

@Torres-ssf Torres-ssf Awaiting requested review from Torres-ssf Torres-ssf will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Torres-ssf is a code owner

@Dhaiwat10 Dhaiwat10 Awaiting requested review from Dhaiwat10 Dhaiwat10 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Dhaiwat10 is a code owner

@danielbate danielbate Awaiting requested review from danielbate danielbate will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review danielbate is a code owner

@nedsalk nedsalk Awaiting requested review from nedsalk nedsalk will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review nedsalk is a code owner

@maschad maschad Awaiting requested review from maschad maschad will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review maschad is a code owner

Assignees

@nedsalk nedsalk

Labels
feat Issue is a feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@petertonysmith94 @nedsalk