Update folv tests acceptance #1612
Conversation
|
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-import-export", "line": 1, "column": 1 }, | ||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-and-then", "line": 27, "column": 9 } | ||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 76, "column": 15 } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
это лучше поправить а не в исключения добавлять
| ], | ||
| "tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-button-in-row-test.js": [ | ||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-import-export", "line": 3, "column": 1 }, | ||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-and-then", "line": 29, "column": 9 } | ||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 10, "column": 65 } |
| ], | ||
| "tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-paging-dropdown-test.js": [ | ||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-import-export", "line": 2, "column": 1 }, | ||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-and-then", "line": 22, "column": 7 } | ||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 1, "column": 17 }, |
| ], | ||
| "tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-sorting-clear-test.js": [ | ||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 3, "column": 10 }, |
| @@ -1118,13 +1090,12 @@ | |||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-and-then", "line": 6, "column": 3 } | |||
| ], | |||
| "tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-sorting-test.js": [ | |||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 3, "column": 10 }, | |||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-and-then", "line": 12, "column": 3 }, | ||
| { "ruleId": "ember/no-test-and-then", "line": 24, "column": 5 } | ||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 3, "column": 10 }, | ||
| { "ruleId": "no-unused-vars", "line": 4, "column": 18 } |
| let result = await store.query(modelName, builder.build()); | ||
| await visit(path + '?perPage=' + result.meta.count); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
какой-то странный пробел
| @@ -1,109 +1,101 @@ | |||
| import { run } from '@ember/runloop'; | |||
| import {all} from 'rsvp'; | |||
| import $ from 'jquery'; | |||
| import RSVP from 'rsvp'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
этот кажется не нужен
|
|
||
| let resolvedPromises; | ||
| run(() => { | ||
| resolvedPromises = RSVP.all(promises); |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces comprehensive updates to various test files in an Ember.js application, focusing on enhancing asynchronous operations by adopting Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (23)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (29)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (54)
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-open-newform-test.js (1)
6-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using modern Ember service injection.
Instead of using the private
__container__lookup, consider using Ember's dependency injection pattern for better maintainability and testing.- const controller = app.__container__.lookup('controller:' + currentRouteName()); + const controller = this.owner.lookup('controller:' + currentRouteName());Or better yet, if you're using newer versions of Ember:
- const controller = app.__container__.lookup('controller:' + currentRouteName()); + import { getOwner } from '@ember/application'; + const controller = getOwner(this).lookup('controller:' + currentRouteName());Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-user-button-test.js (3)
24-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Modernize Ember syntax and improve assertion messages.
The code uses deprecated
getsyntax and lacks descriptive assertion messages.- assert.notOk(controller.get('modelFromClickedRow')); + assert.notOk(controller.modelFromClickedRow, 'No row should be selected initially'); await click('.ui.button > .bug.icon:first'); await settled; - assert.equal(controller.get('modelFromClickedRow.id'), controller.get('model.firstObject.id')) + assert.equal(controller.modelFromClickedRow?.id, controller.model.firstObject?.id, 'Clicked row model should match the first record');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.assert.notOk(controller.modelFromClickedRow, 'No row should be selected initially'); await click('.ui.button > .bug.icon:first'); await settled; assert.equal(controller.modelFromClickedRow?.id, controller.model.firstObject?.id, 'Clicked row model should match the first record');
11-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use template literals for controller lookup path.
Modern JavaScript favors template literals over string concatenation.
- let controller = app.__container__.lookup('controller:' + currentRouteName()); + let controller = app.__container__.lookup(`controller:${currentRouteName()}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let controller = app.__container__.lookup(`controller:${currentRouteName()}`);
14-22:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent async operation handling.
The test mixes async/await with the legacy
andThenpattern and has an unhandled promise fromclick.Apply these changes to maintain consistent async handling:
await click('.toggle-hi-button'); // First click. await click('.test-click-button'); assert.equal(controller.clickCounter, 2, 'Test button was pressed'); // Second click. - click('.test-click-button'); - andThen(() => assert.equal(controller.clickCounter, 3, 'Test button was pressed')); + await click('.test-click-button'); + assert.equal(controller.clickCounter, 3, 'Test button was pressed');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await click('.toggle-hi-button'); // First click. await click('.test-click-button'); assert.equal(controller.clickCounter, 2, 'Test button was pressed'); // Second click. await click('.test-click-button'); assert.equal(controller.clickCounter, 3, 'Test button was pressed');tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-locales-test.js (1)
16-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using modern Ember test helpers
While the async conversion is good, consider replacing jQuery selectors with modern
@ember/test-helpersfor better maintainability and reliability:- async function toolbarBtnTextAssert(currentLocale) { - assert.notEqual($toolBarButtons.length, 0, 'buttons in toolbar exists'); - assert.equal($toolBarButtons[0].innerText.trim(), get(currentLocale, 'components.olv-toolbar.refresh-button-text'), 'button refresh exist'); - assert.equal($toolBarButtons[1].innerText.trim(), get(currentLocale, 'components.olv-toolbar.add-button-text'), 'button create exist'); - assert.equal($toolBarButtons[2].innerText.trim(), get(currentLocale, 'components.olv-toolbar.delete-button-text'), 'button delete exist'); - assert.equal($($toolBarButtons[2]).hasClass('disabled'), true, 'button delete is disabled'); + async function toolbarBtnTextAssert(currentLocale) { + const buttons = await findAll('.ui.secondary.menu button'); + assert.ok(buttons.length > 0, 'Toolbar buttons should exist'); + + assert.dom(buttons[0]).hasText( + get(currentLocale, 'components.olv-toolbar.refresh-button-text'), + 'Refresh button should have correct text' + ); + assert.dom(buttons[1]).hasText( + get(currentLocale, 'components.olv-toolbar.add-button-text'), + 'Add button should have correct text' + ); + assert.dom(buttons[2]).hasText( + get(currentLocale, 'components.olv-toolbar.delete-button-text'), + 'Delete button should have correct text' + ); + assert.dom(buttons[2]).hasClass('disabled', 'Delete button should be disabled'); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-toolbar-custom-components-test.js (2)
14-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using modern Ember test selectors
The test currently uses jQuery selectors for DOM manipulation. Consider using
data-test-*selectors with@ember/test-helpersfor better maintainability and alignment with modern Ember testing practices.Example refactor:
- let $toolbar = $('.flexberry-olv-toolbar'); - let $dropdown = $toolbar.children('.flexberry-dropdown'); + let toolbar = find('[data-test-olv-toolbar]'); + let dropdown = find('[data-test-olv-dropdown]');Also update your template to include these attributes:
6-44: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the comprehensive results, I can now provide a final response about the async patterns in the test suite:
Async patterns need standardization across test files
The verification revealed mixed patterns that need attention:
- Several files still use the outdated
andThenpattern- Some
clickoperations are not properly awaited- Inconsistent usage of
settled()after async operationsKey findings:
- Many newer tests correctly use async/await with
settled()- The file under review (
folv-toolbar-custom-components-test.js) follows modern practices- However, there are numerous files that need updates to follow the same patterns
The codebase would benefit from standardizing on modern async patterns:
- Replace all
andThenusage with async/await- Ensure all
clickoperations are properly awaited- Consistently use
settled()after user interactions- Update test declarations to use async functions where needed
This standardization will improve test reliability and maintainability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify async test helper usage across the test suite
The async patterns in this file look good, but let's ensure consistent usage across related test files.
Let me generate a new script to better verify the async patterns, particularly focusing on the
clickinteractions since the previous regex had issues.The previous results showed that there are several files using the outdated
andThenpattern, but we need to verify the current patterns being used with click interactions and settled usage to make a complete assessment.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential inconsistent async patterns in test files echo "Checking for potentially missing await statements..." rg "visit\([^)]+\)[^;]" "tests/acceptance" echo "Checking for outdated andThen usage..." rg "andThen\(" "tests/acceptance" echo "Checking for consistent settled usage after interactions..." rg "click\([^)]+\);(?!.*settled)" "tests/acceptance"Length of output: 10231
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for click interactions without await echo "Checking for non-awaited click interactions..." rg "click\([^)]+\);" tests/acceptance # Check for proper async/await usage in test files echo -e "\nChecking for proper async test usage..." rg "test\(['\"].*['\"],\s*(async)?\s*\([^)]*\)\s*=>" tests/acceptance # Check for proper settled usage echo -e "\nChecking for settled usage..." rg "settled\(\)" tests/acceptanceLength of output: 16276
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-sorting-by-computable-field-test.js (2)
30-32:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd await to click operation in refreshFunction
The click operation inside the async refresh function should be awaited to ensure proper handling of asynchronous behavior.
let refreshFunction = async function() { - click($thead); + await click($thead); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let refreshFunction = async function() { await click($thead); };
25-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider migrating from jQuery selectors to modern testing selectors
The test is using jQuery selectors (
$) for DOM traversal. Consider using modern Ember test helpers likefind()orfindAll()for better maintainability and alignment with current best practices.- let $olv = $('.object-list-view '); - let $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[9]; + let thead = findAll('.object-list-view th.dt-head-left')[9];Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-sorting-with-default-setting-test.js (2)
22-28:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove refresh function implementation.
Two issues need to be addressed:
- The click operation inside the refresh function should be awaited
- The run loop wrapper is unnecessary for async functions
- await run(async () => { - await loadingLocales('ru', app); - // Refresh function. - let refreshFunction = async function () { - let $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; - click($($thead)); - }; + await loadingLocales('ru', app); + + // Refresh function. + let refreshFunction = async function () { + let $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; + await click($($thead)); + };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await loadingLocales('ru', app); // Refresh function. let refreshFunction = async function () { let $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; await click($($thead)); };
30-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated jQuery selectors.
The jQuery selectors for header elements are duplicated throughout the test. Consider extracting them into helper functions for better maintainability.
+ const getHeaderElements = ($olv) => { + const $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; + const $ord = $('.object-list-view-order-icon', $thead); + const $divOrd = $('div', $ord); + return { $thead, $ord, $divOrd }; + }; - let $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; - let $ord = $('.object-list-view-order-icon', $thead); - let $divOrd = $('div', $ord); + const { $thead, $ord, $divOrd } = getHeaderElements($olv);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const getHeaderElements = ($olv) => { const $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; const $ord = $('.object-list-view-order-icon', $thead); const $divOrd = $('div', $ord); return { $thead, $ord, $divOrd }; }; const { $thead, $ord, $divOrd } = getHeaderElements($olv); assert.equal($divOrd.attr('title'), get(I18nRuLocale, 'components.object-list-view.sort-ascending'), 'title is Order ascending'); assert.equal($('.icon', $divOrd).hasClass('ascending'), true, 'sorting symbol added'); assert.equal(controller.sort, '+name', 'up sorting in URL');tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-paging-dropdown-test.js (2)
38-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the timeout configurable and simplifying the async structure.
The hardcoded 500ms timeout could lead to flaky tests on slower systems. Also, the Promise/later combination could be simplified.
- let timeout = 500; - return new Promise((resolve) => { - later(async() => { - let menuIsVisible = $menu.hasClass('visible'); - assert.strictEqual(menuIsVisible, true, 'menu is visible'); - let $choosedItem = $('.item', $menu); - await click($choosedItem[1]); - resolve(); - }, timeout); - }); + const DROPDOWN_ANIMATION_TIMEOUT = 500; // Consider moving to test config + await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, DROPDOWN_ANIMATION_TIMEOUT)); + + let menuIsVisible = $menu.hasClass('visible'); + assert.strictEqual(menuIsVisible, true, 'menu is visible'); + let $choosedItem = $('.item', $menu); + await click($choosedItem[1]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const DROPDOWN_ANIMATION_TIMEOUT = 500; // Consider moving to test config await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, DROPDOWN_ANIMATION_TIMEOUT)); let menuIsVisible = $menu.hasClass('visible'); assert.strictEqual(menuIsVisible, true, 'menu is visible'); let $choosedItem = $('.item', $menu); await click($choosedItem[1]);
28-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using data-test- attributes for more reliable selectors.*
The jQuery selectors based on classes like '.flexberry-dropdown.compact' and '.menu' could be fragile if styles change. Consider using dedicated test attributes.
- let $folvPerPageButton = $('.flexberry-dropdown.compact'); - let $menu = $('.menu', $folvPerPageButton); + let $folvPerPageButton = $('[data-test-per-page-dropdown]'); + let $menu = $('[data-test-dropdown-menu]', $folvPerPageButton);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-wrapper-projection-test.js (2)
14-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify projection name retrieval
The arrow function wrapper for getting the projection name adds unnecessary complexity.
Consider simplifying to a direct property getter:
- let projectionName = () => { return get(controller, 'modelProjection'); }; + const getProjectionName = () => get(controller, 'modelProjection');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let controller = app.__container__.lookup('controller:' + currentRouteName()); const getProjectionName = () => get(controller, 'modelProjection');
37-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve projection attribute verification logic
The current implementation using a mutable flag and forEach could be more functional.
Consider refactoring to use array methods:
- let flag = true; - /* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ - Object.keys(attrs).forEach((element, index, array) => { - if (attrs[element].kind !== 'hasMany') { - flag = flag && ($.trim(dtHeadTable[index].innerText) === attrs[element].caption); - } - }); - /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */ - assert.ok(flag, 'projection = columns names'); + const columnsMatch = Object.entries(attrs) + .filter(([_, attr]) => attr.kind !== 'hasMany') + .every(([_, attr], index) => + $.trim(dtHeadTable[index].innerText) === attr.caption + ); + assert.ok(columnsMatch, 'projection columns match attribute captions');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await loadingLocales('en', app.__container__.owner); // Check projectionName. let attrs = projectionName().attributes; const columnsMatch = Object.entries(attrs) .filter(([_, attr]) => attr.kind !== 'hasMany') .every(([_, attr], index) => $.trim(dtHeadTable[index].innerText) === attr.caption ); assert.ok(columnsMatch, 'projection columns match attribute captions');tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-sorting-clear-test.js (2)
39-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the refresh function more reusable
The refresh function could be moved to the shared test utilities and made more generic to handle different header selections.
- let refreshFunction = async function() { - await click( $thead); - }; + let refreshFunction = async function(selector) { + await click(selector || $thead); + };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Refresh function. let refreshFunction = async function(selector) { await click(selector || $thead); }; await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller)
54-57: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use data-test- attributes for selectors*
Consider using data-test-* attributes instead of class selectors for test stability. Classes might change for styling purposes, breaking the tests.
- let $clearButton = $('.clear-sorting-button'); + let $clearButton = $('[data-test-clear-sorting]');Add the attribute to your clear button component:
-<button class="ui clear-sorting-button"> +<button class="ui clear-sorting-button" data-test-clear-sorting>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-limit-function-test.js (2)
17-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve variable naming and error handling
- The variable
resultis reused which reduces code clarity- The empty data check should be performed before accessing the array elements
- let result = await store.query(modelName, builder1.build()); - let arr = result.toArray(); + let queryResult1 = await store.query(modelName, builder1.build()); + let arr = queryResult1.toArray(); count = arr.length; let builder2 = new Builder(store).from(modelName).selectByProjection('SuggestionL').where('address', FilterOperator.Neq, ''); - result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - arr = result.toArray(); + let queryResult2 = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + arr = queryResult2.toArray(); + + if (arr.length < 2) { + assert.ok(false, 'Load empty data'); + return; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let builder1 = new Builder(store).from(modelName).selectByProjection('SuggestionL'); let queryResult1 = await store.query(modelName, builder1.build()); let arr = queryResult1.toArray(); count = arr.length; let builder2 = new Builder(store).from(modelName).selectByProjection('SuggestionL').where('address', FilterOperator.Neq, ''); let queryResult2 = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); arr = queryResult2.toArray(); if (arr.length < 2) { assert.ok(false, 'Load empty data'); return; }
43-64: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify async handling by removing unnecessary assert.async()
Since the test is using async/await, the
assert.async()calls and their correspondingdonecalls are no longer needed. This will make the code cleaner and easier to understand.- let done1 = assert.async(); await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller) let resultText = $('.oveflow-text')[0]; assert.notEqual(controller.model.content.length, count, 'Folv load with object current count'); assert.equal(resultText.innerText, result1, 'Correct result afther apply limitFunction'); controller.set('limitFunction', result2); - let done2 = assert.async(); await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller); resultText = $('.oveflow-text')[0]; assert.notEqual(controller.model.content.length, count, 'Folv load with current object count'); assert.equal(resultText.innerText, result2, 'Correct result afther apply limitFunction'); controller.set('limitFunction', undefined); - let done3 = assert.async(); await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller); assert.equal(controller.model.content.length, count, 'Folv load with current object count'); - done3(); - done2(); - done1();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller) let resultText = $('.oveflow-text')[0]; assert.notEqual(controller.model.content.length, count, 'Folv load with object current count'); assert.equal(resultText.innerText, result1, 'Correct result afther apply limitFunction'); controller.set('limitFunction', result2); await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller); resultText = $('.oveflow-text')[0]; assert.notEqual(controller.model.content.length, count, 'Folv load with current object count'); assert.equal(resultText.innerText, result2, 'Correct result afther apply limitFunction'); controller.set('limitFunction', undefined); await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller); assert.equal(controller.model.content.length, count, 'Folv load with current object count');tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-button-in-row-test.js (4)
18-27:
⚠️ Potential issueMove
visit()outside ofrun()The
visit()helper should not be wrapped inrun()as it manages its own runloop. This could cause timing issues.- await run(async () => { - let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); - await newRecord.save(); - addDataForDestroy(newRecord); - let builder = new Builder(store).from(modelName).count(); - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder.build()); - await visit(path + '?perPage=' + result.meta.count); - }); + await run(async () => { + let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); + await newRecord.save(); + addDataForDestroy(newRecord); + }); + + let builder = new Builder(store).from(modelName).count(); + let result = await store.query(modelName, builder.build()); + await visit(path + '?perPage=' + result.meta.count);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await run(async () => { let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); await newRecord.save(); addDataForDestroy(newRecord); }); let builder = new Builder(store).from(modelName).count(); let result = await store.query(modelName, builder.build()); await visit(path + '?perPage=' + result.meta.count);
34-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using modern test helpers instead of jQuery
The test heavily relies on jQuery selectors which is discouraged in modern Ember testing. Consider using
@ember/test-helpersfunctions likefind()andfindAll().- let $folvContainer = $(olvContainerClass); - let $rows = () => { return $(trTableClass, $folvContainer).toArray(); }; - let recordIsForDeleting = await run(() => { - return $rows().reduce((sum, element) => { - let nameRecord = $.trim(element.children[1].innerText); - let flag = nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0; - return sum + flag; - }, 0); - }); + const rows = await findAll(`${olvContainerClass} ${trTableClass}`); + const matchingRecordsCount = rows.filter(row => + row.children[1].textContent.trim().includes(uuid) + ).length;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const rows = await findAll(`${olvContainerClass} ${trTableClass}`); const matchingRecordsCount = rows.filter(row => row.children[1].textContent.trim().includes(uuid) ).length;
48-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve delete operation handling
Several improvements can be made to the delete operation:
- Remove unnecessary eslint-disable comments
- Use modern test helpers for button selection
- Consider adding a small delay between deletes to prevent potential race conditions
- /* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ - let clickPromises = []; - $rows().forEach(function(element) { - let nameRecord = $.trim(element.children[1].innerText); - if (nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0) { - let $deleteBtnInRow = $('.object-list-view-row-delete-button', element)[0]; - clickPromises.push(run(() => click($deleteBtnInRow))); - } - }); - /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */ - await Promise.all(clickPromises); + const rows = await findAll(`${olvContainerClass} ${trTableClass}`); + for (const row of rows) { + const nameRecord = row.children[1].textContent.trim(); + if (nameRecord.includes(uuid)) { + const deleteButton = row.querySelector('.object-list-view-row-delete-button'); + await click(deleteButton); + await settled(); // Ensure each delete completes before next + } + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
71-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify store verification logic
The current implementation uses arbitrary timeouts and complex Promise nesting. Consider using
settled()orwaitFor()instead.- let timeout = 500; - await new Promise(resolve => { - run(() => { - later(async () => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.notOk(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\' not found in store'); - resolve(); - }, timeout); - }); - }); + await settled(); + const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.notOk(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Check that the records have been removed into store. let builder2 = new Builder(store, modelName).where('name', FilterOperator.Eq, uuid).count(); await settled(); const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); assert.notOk(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`);tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-sorting-test.js (3)
55-69: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting repeated assertion patterns
The test repeats similar assertion patterns for different sorting states. This could be refactored into a helper function for better maintainability.
Create a helper function:
async function assertSortingState(assert, controller, expectedTitle, expectedIconClass, expectedSort, expectedOrderBy) { const $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; const $ord = $('.object-list-view-order-icon', $thead); const $divOrd = $('div', $ord); assert.equal($divOrd.attr('title'), expectedTitle, `title is ${expectedTitle}`); assert.equal($('.icon', $divOrd).hasClass(expectedIconClass), true, 'correct sorting icon'); assert.equal(controller.sort, expectedSort, 'correct sorting in URL'); const isTrue = await checkSortingList(store, projectionName, $olv, expectedOrderBy); assert.ok(isTrue, 'sorting applied correctly'); }
71-76:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd assertions for the final sorting cycle
The test verifies the sort parameter but doesn't assert the actual sorting state or icon presence in the final cycle.
Add missing assertions:
await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller); assert.equal(controller.sort, null, 'no sorting in URL'); +assert.ok($thead.children[0].children.length === 1, 'sorting icon removed'); +const isTrue = await checkSortingList(store, projectionName, $olv, null); +assert.ok(isTrue, 'sorting removed correctly'); await refreshListByFunction(refreshFunction, controller); assert.equal(controller.sort, '+address', 'up sorting in URL'); +assert.ok($('.icon', $divOrd).hasClass("ascending"), 'sorting cycle completed correctly');Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
23-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using querySelector instead of jQuery
While the code works, modern DOM APIs like
querySelectorcould replace jQuery selectors for better maintainability and reduced dependencies.-let $olv = $('.object-list-view '); -let $thead = $('th.dt-head-left', $olv)[0]; +const olv = document.querySelector('.object-list-view'); +const thead = olv.querySelector('th.dt-head-left');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const olv = document.querySelector('.object-list-view'); const thead = olv.querySelector('th.dt-head-left'); let currentSorting = controller.get('computedSorting'); if (!$.isEmptyObject(currentSorting)) { orderByClause = getOrderByClause(currentSorting); }tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-test.js (3)
44-55: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify promise collection and remove unnecessary eslint comments.
The click promises collection can be simplified using
mapand the eslint comments appear unnecessary.- /* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ - let clickPromises = []; - $rows().forEach(function(element) { - let nameRecord = $.trim(element.children[1].innerText); - if (nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0) { - let $deleteBtnInRow = $('.object-list-view-row-delete-button', element)[0]; - clickPromises.push(click($deleteBtnInRow)); - } - }); - /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */ + const clickPromises = $rows() + .filter(element => $.trim(element.children[1].innerText).includes(uuid)) + .map(element => click($('.object-list-view-row-delete-button', element)[0]));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const clickPromises = $rows() .filter(element => $.trim(element.children[1].innerText).includes(uuid)) .map(element => click($('.object-list-view-row-delete-button', element)[0])); await Promise.all(clickPromises);
69-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve final verification step readability.
The timeout-based verification could be made more explicit and simplified.
- let timeout = 500; - await new Promise(resolve => - later(async() => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.notOk(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); - resolve(); - }), timeout); + const DELETION_VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT = 500; // ms - Time to wait for deletion to complete + await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, DELETION_VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT)); + + const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.notOk(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Check that the records had been removed from store. let builder2 = new Builder(store, modelName).where('name', FilterOperator.Eq, uuid).count(); const DELETION_VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT = 500; // ms - Time to wait for deletion to complete await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, DELETION_VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT)); const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); assert.notOk(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`);
29-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated selectors and simplify record counting.
The jQuery selectors and record counting logic could be simplified for better maintainability.
- let olvContainerClass = '.object-list-view-container'; - let trTableClass = 'table.object-list-view tbody tr'; - - let $folvContainer = $(olvContainerClass); - let $rows = () => { return $(trTableClass, $folvContainer).toArray(); }; - - // Check that the records have been added. - let recordIsForDeleting = $rows().reduce((sum, element) => { - let nameRecord = $.trim(element.children[1].innerText); - let flag = nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0; - return sum + flag; - }, 0); + const SELECTORS = { + container: '.object-list-view-container', + rows: 'table.object-list-view tbody tr' + }; + + const getRows = () => $(SELECTORS.rows, $(SELECTORS.container)).toArray(); + + // Check that the records have been added. + const recordIsForDeleting = getRows().some(element => + $.trim(element.children[1].innerText).includes(uuid) + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const SELECTORS = { container: '.object-list-view-container', rows: 'table.object-list-view tbody tr' }; const getRows = () => $(SELECTORS.rows, $(SELECTORS.container)).toArray(); // Check that the records have been added. const recordIsForDeleting = getRows().some(element => $.trim(element.children[1].innerText).includes(uuid) );tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-with-promise-test.js (2)
71-82: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve timeout handling and promise chain
Two suggestions for improvement:
- The hardcoded timeout value should be defined as a named constant at the top of the file
- The promise chain with run/later could be simplified
Consider this refactor:
+ const STORE_QUERY_TIMEOUT = 500; - let timeout = 500; - await new Promise(resolve => { - run(() => { - later(async() => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.notOk(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); - resolve(); - }, timeout); - }); - }); + await new Promise(resolve => + later(async () => { + let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.notOk(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); + resolve(); + }, STORE_QUERY_TIMEOUT) + );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
29-52: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider modernizing DOM operations
The test is using jQuery for DOM manipulation which is discouraged in modern Ember applications. Consider refactoring to use
@ember/test-helpersmethods instead.Example refactor:
- let $folvContainer = $(olvContainerClass); - let $rows = () => { return $(trTableClass, $folvContainer).toArray(); }; + let folvContainer = document.querySelector(olvContainerClass); + let rows = () => Array.from(folvContainer.querySelectorAll(trTableClass)); - let recordIsForDeleting = $rows().reduce((sum, element) => { - let nameRecord = $.trim(element.children[1].innerText); + let recordIsForDeleting = rows().reduce((sum, element) => { + let nameRecord = element.children[1].innerText.trim();Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-data-cancel-test.js (4)
32-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Modernize DOM interaction approach.
The test heavily relies on jQuery and direct DOM manipulation which is discouraged in modern Ember testing. Consider using
@ember/test-helpersmethods and data-test-* selectors.- let $folvContainer = $(olvContainerClass); - let $rows = () => { return $(trTableClass, $folvContainer).toArray(); }; + let rows = () => document.querySelectorAll('[data-test-folv-row]'); + let getRowName = (row) => row.querySelector('[data-test-folv-name]').textContent.trim();Also applies to: 36-40
17-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing redundant run loop wrapper.
In modern Ember.js applications with async/await, explicitly wrapping operations in
runis usually unnecessary as Ember handles this automatically.- await run(async() => { + let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); + await newRecord.save(); + addDataForDestroy(newRecord); - let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); - await newRecord.save() - addDataForDestroy(newRecord); - });Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
71-78:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove test stability and cleanup.
The test uses an arbitrary timeout of 500ms and nests cleanup within the timeout callback, which could lead to flaky tests and unreliable cleanup.
Consider restructuring like this:
- let timeout = 500; - await new Promise(resolve => - later(async() => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); - resolve(); - await newRecord.destroyRecord(); - }, timeout)); + // Wait for any pending operations to settle + await settled(); + + let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); + + // Cleanup should be in a try/finally block + await newRecord.destroyRecord();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Wait for any pending operations to settle await settled(); let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); // Cleanup should be in a try/finally block await newRecord.destroyRecord();
11-11: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issuePath in test file needs to be updated to match the actual route path
The test file's path contains a typo that doesn't match the actual route definitions in the application. The router.js shows that the correct path is:
components-examples/flexberry-objectlistview/before-delete-record/folv-for-before-delete-record-data-cancelwhile the test uses:
components-examples/flexberry-objectlistview/before-delete-record/folv-for-before-delete-record-data-cancelThe test path should be updated to match the route definition in router.js to ensure proper test navigation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix typo in the test path.
The path contains a typo "recoed" which should be "record". This might indicate that the actual route path also contains this typo.
Let's verify if this typo exists in route definitions:
Let me gather more information about the route definitions to understand if this is a consistent naming pattern across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for both correct and incorrect spellings to identify mismatches echo "Searching for route definitions with 'recoed'..." rg -l "before-delete-recoed" echo "Searching for route definitions with 'record'..." rg -l "before-delete-record"Length of output: 928
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual route definition in router.js echo "Content of router.js route definition:" rg -A 5 -B 5 "before-delete-record" tests/dummy/app/router.js # Check if there are any route templates or components with this naming echo -e "\nSearching for related template files:" fd -e hbs . | rg -i "before-delete" # Check for any controller or route files echo -e "\nSearching for related controller/route files:" fd -e js . | rg "(controller|route).+before-delete"Length of output: 4671
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-data-immediately-test.js (5)
9-79: 💡 Codebase verification
Assertion count mismatch detected in test
The test declares
assert.expect(5)but contains 6 actual assertions:
assert.equal(currentPath(), path)assert.equal(recordIsForDeleting > 0, true, ...)assert.ok(controller.recordWasNotDelete, ...)assert.ok(recordsIsDeleteBtnInRow, ...)assert.ok(result.meta.count, ...)- The initial
assert.expect(5)itself counts as an assertionThis mismatch could lead to test failures or mask potential issues. The
assert.expect()count should be updated to 6 to match the actual number of assertions in the test.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify assertion count matches test expectations
The test expects 5 assertions. Let's verify that all assertion points are properly counted.
Let me gather more specific information about the assertions to understand this discrepancy better.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Count actual assertions in the test file echo "Checking assertion count..." rg "assert\." tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-data-immediately-test.js -cLength of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get all assertions with context to analyze them echo "Listing all assertions with context..." rg "assert\." tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-data-immediately-test.js -B 1 -A 1Length of output: 1110
70-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve timeout-based verification logic
The current implementation has several issues:
- The timeout value should be defined as a constant
- The Promise wrapping can be simplified
- The async/await usage is unnecessarily complex
- let timeout = 500; - await new Promise(resolve => - later(async() => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); - resolve(); - await newRecord.destroyRecord(); - }, timeout)); + const VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT = 500; + await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT)); + const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.ok(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`); + await newRecord.destroyRecord();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT = 500; await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, VERIFICATION_TIMEOUT)); const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); assert.ok(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`); await newRecord.destroyRecord();
17-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify async code by removing unnecessary run() wrapper
The
run()wrapper is not needed here as we're already in an async context. Modern Ember.js recommends avoidingrun()for async operations.- await run(async() => { + let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); + await newRecord.save(); + addDataForDestroy(newRecord); - });Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
43-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify delete operations using async/await with filter and map
The delete operation collection can be simplified using modern array methods and async/await.
- let clickPromises = []; - $rows().forEach(function(element, i, arr) { - let nameRecord = $.trim(element.children[1].innerText); - if (nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0) { - let $deleteBtnInRow = $('.object-list-view-row-delete-button', element)[0]; - clickPromises.push(click($deleteBtnInRow)); - } - }); - await Promise.all(clickPromises); + const rowsToDelete = $rows() + .filter(element => element.children[1].innerText.trim().includes(uuid)); + await Promise.all( + rowsToDelete.map(row => + click(row.querySelector('.object-list-view-row-delete-button')) + ) + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./* eslint-disable no-unused-vars */ const rowsToDelete = $rows() .filter(element => element.children[1].innerText.trim().includes(uuid)); await Promise.all( rowsToDelete.map(row => click(row.querySelector('.object-list-view-row-delete-button')) ) ); /* eslint-enable no-unused-vars */
28-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Modernize DOM queries by using test helpers instead of jQuery
Consider using modern Ember test helpers like
find()andfindAll()instead of jQuery selectors for better maintainability and consistency with current Ember testing practices.- let $folvContainer = $(olvContainerClass); - let $rows = () => { return $(trTableClass, $folvContainer).toArray(); }; + let $rows = () => { return findAll(`${olvContainerClass} ${trTableClass}`); };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-with-promise-data-cancel-test.js (3)
17-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the async structure
The nested async functions can be flattened, and the
run()wrapper might be unnecessary in modern Ember versions.Consider simplifying to:
- await run(async() => { - let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); - - await newRecord.save(); - addDataForDestroy(newRecord); + let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); + await newRecord.save(); + addDataForDestroy(newRecord);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); await newRecord.save(); addDataForDestroy(newRecord);
29-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider migrating from jQuery to native DOM APIs
Modern Ember.js applications should prefer native DOM APIs over jQuery for better performance and maintainability.
Example refactor:
- let $folvContainer = $(olvContainerClass); - let $rows = () => { return $(trTableClass, $folvContainer).toArray(); }; + let folvContainer = document.querySelector(olvContainerClass); + let rows = () => Array.from(folvContainer.querySelectorAll(trTableClass));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let olvContainerClass = '.object-list-view-container'; let trTableClass = 'table.object-list-view tbody tr'; let folvContainer = document.querySelector(olvContainerClass); let rows = () => Array.from(folvContainer.querySelectorAll(trTableClass));
69-78: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the timeout and cleanup logic
The current implementation uses complex promise nesting with timeouts. This can be simplified using modern async/await patterns.
Consider restructuring:
- await new Promise(resolve => - later(async() => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); - resolve(); - await newRecord.destroyRecord(); - }, timeout)); + await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, timeout)); + let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); + await newRecord.destroyRecord();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Check that the records haven't been removed from store. let builder2 = new Builder(store, modelName).where('name', FilterOperator.Eq, uuid).count(); let timeout = 500; await new Promise(resolve => later(resolve, timeout)); let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); await newRecord.destroyRecord();tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-before-recoed-with-promise-data-immediately-test.js (2)
69-78: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify asynchronous verification logic
The current implementation uses a timeout-based approach with nested promises, which is fragile and hard to maintain. The
later()wrapper with a new Promise is unnecessarily complex when using async/await.Consider simplifying the verification:
- let timeout = 500; - await new Promise(resolve => - later(async() => { - let result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); - assert.ok(result.meta.count, 'record \'' + uuid + '\'not found in store'); - resolve(); - await newRecord.destroyRecord(); - }, timeout)); + // Wait for any pending operations to complete + await settled(); + + const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); + assert.ok(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`); + + await newRecord.destroyRecord();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Check that the records have been removed from store. let builder2 = new Builder(store, modelName).where('name', FilterOperator.Eq, uuid).count(); // Wait for any pending operations to complete await settled(); const result = await store.query(modelName, builder2.build()); assert.ok(result.meta.count, `record '${uuid}' not found in store`); await newRecord.destroyRecord();
17-42: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider modernizing test helpers usage
The test uses older patterns that could be updated:
run()is typically unnecessary in modern Ember tests with async/await- jQuery selectors could be replaced with modern test helpers
Consider updating to modern test helpers:
- await run(async() => { + let newRecord = store.createRecord(modelName, { name: uuid }); + await newRecord.save(); + addDataForDestroy(newRecord); + + let builder = new Builder(store).from(modelName).count(); + let result = await store.query(modelName, builder.build()); + await visit(path + '?perPage=' + result.meta.count); + + assert.equal(currentPath(), path); + + // Use modern test helpers instead of jQuery + const rows = await findAll('table.object-list-view tbody tr'); + const recordExists = rows.some(row => { + return row.textContent.includes(uuid); + }); + + assert.true(recordExists, '1 record added'); - });Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-getCellComponent-test.js (1)
18-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider modernizing DOM queries
The current implementation heavily relies on jQuery selectors. Consider refactoring to use modern Ember test selectors for better maintainability and reliability.
- let $folvContainer = $('.object-list-view-container'); - let $table = $('table.object-list-view', $folvContainer); + let folvContainer = find('[data-test-folv-container]'); + let table = find('[data-test-folv-table]');You'll need to add corresponding data-test attributes to your templates:
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-button-test.js (3)
38-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify promise handling
The promise resolution can be simplified by removing the unnecessary run wrapper and intermediate variable.
-let resolvedPromises; -run(() => { - resolvedPromises = RSVP.all(promises); -}); -await resolvedPromises; -assert.ok(resolvedPromises, 'All records saved.'); +await all(promises); +assert.ok(true, 'All records saved.');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.await all(promises); assert.ok(true, 'All records saved.');
58-62: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider modernizing the record verification
The record verification could be more readable and maintainable.
-let recordIsForDeleting = $rows().reduce((sum, current) => { - let nameRecord = $.trim(current.children[1].innerText); - let flag = (nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0); - return sum + flag; -}, 0); +let recordIsForDeleting = $rows().filter((row) => { + const nameRecord = $.trim(row.children[1].innerText); + return nameRecord.includes(uuid); +}).length;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let recordIsForDeleting = $rows().filter((row) => { const nameRecord = $.trim(row.children[1].innerText); return nameRecord.includes(uuid); }).length;
66-78: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify checkRecords promise handling
The promise handling in checkRecords can be simplified by removing the manual promises array management.
let checkRecords = async function() { - promises.clear(); - $rows().forEach((row) => { + const clickPromises = $rows().map((row) => { let nameRecord = $.trim(row.children[1].innerText); let $firstCell = $('.object-list-view-helper-column-cell', row); let checkboxInRow = $('.flexberry-checkbox', $firstCell)[0]; if (nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0) { - run(()=> promises.pushObject(click(checkboxInRow))); + return click(checkboxInRow); } + return Promise.resolve(); }); - await all(promises); + await all(clickPromises); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let checkRecords = async function() { const clickPromises = $rows().map((row) => { let nameRecord = $.trim(row.children[1].innerText); let $firstCell = $('.object-list-view-helper-column-cell', row); let checkboxInRow = $('.flexberry-checkbox', $firstCell)[0]; if (nameRecord.indexOf(uuid) >= 0) { return click(checkboxInRow); } return Promise.resolve(); }); await all(clickPromises); };tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-paging-navigation-test.js (3)
22-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using data-test- attributes for more robust selectors.*
The current jQuery selectors (.ui.button, .ui.basic.buttons) are coupled to styling classes which could change. Consider using dedicated test attributes for more reliable test selectors.
- let $basicButtons = $('.ui.button', '.ui.basic.buttons'); + let $basicButtons = $('[data-test-pagination-button]', '[data-test-pagination-container]');This would require updating your component template with corresponding attributes:
51-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce code duplication in pagination assertions.
Consider extracting the repeated assertion patterns into helper functions to improve maintainability and readability.
// Helper function to verify page button states const assertPageButtonStates = (buttons, {activePage, isFirstPage, isLastPage}) => { if (isFirstPage) { assert.equal($(buttons[0]).hasClass('disabled'), true, 'prev button is disabled'); } if (isLastPage) { assert.equal($(buttons[buttons.length-1]).hasClass('disabled'), true, 'next button is disabled'); } buttons.forEach((button, index) => { assert.equal($(button).hasClass('active'), index === activePage, `page ${index} ${index === activePage ? 'is' : 'is not'} active`); }); };
34-49: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the refresh function implementation.
The current implementation creates a new function for each navigation action. Consider extracting this to a reusable helper function.
- let refreshFunction = async function() { - let refreshButton = $basicButtons[4]; - await click( refreshButton); - }; + const createPageClickFunction = (buttonIndex) => async () => { + await click($basicButtons[buttonIndex]); + }; + + await refreshListByFunction(createPageClickFunction(4), controller);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const createPageClickFunction = (buttonIndex) => async () => { await click($basicButtons[buttonIndex]); }; await refreshListByFunction(createPageClickFunction(4), controller); $basicButtons = $('.ui.button', '.ui.basic.buttons'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[1]).hasClass('active'), false, 'page 1 is not active'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[4]).hasClass('active'), true, 'page 4 is active'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[1])[0].innerText, 1, '1st page is depicted'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[2])[0].innerText, '...', '... page is depicted'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[3])[0].innerText, 3, '3rd page is depicted'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[4])[0].innerText, 4, '4th page is depicted'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[5])[0].innerText, 5, '5th page is depicted'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[6])[0].innerText, '...', '... page is depicted'); assert.equal($($basicButtons[7])[0].innerText, last, 'last page is depicted');tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-user-settings-test.js (2)
116-128:
⚠️ Potential issueFix indentation and consider adding error handling.
The async conversion is good, but there are some formatting issues to address.
Apply this diff to fix indentation and add error handling:
async function deleteUserSetting(assert) { - let foundRecords = await userService._getExistingSettings('FOLVPagingObjectListView', 'DEFAULT'); - - if (foundRecords && foundRecords.length > 0) { - assert.equal(foundRecords.length, 1, "Найдена настройка пользователя."); - foundRecords[0].deleteRecord(); - await foundRecords[0].save(); - assert.ok(true, "Настройки пользователя удалены из БД."); - } - else { - assert.ok(true, "Настройки пользователя не найдены в БД."); - } - } + try { + const foundRecords = await userService._getExistingSettings('FOLVPagingObjectListView', 'DEFAULT'); + + if (foundRecords && foundRecords.length > 0) { + assert.equal(foundRecords.length, 1, "Найдена настройка пользователя."); + foundRecords[0].deleteRecord(); + await foundRecords[0].save(); + assert.ok(true, "Настройки пользователя удалены из БД."); + } else { + assert.ok(true, "Настройки пользователя не найдены в БД."); + } + } catch (error) { + assert.ok(false, `Failed to delete user setting: ${error.message}`); + } +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async function deleteUserSetting(assert) { try { const foundRecords = await userService._getExistingSettings('FOLVPagingObjectListView', 'DEFAULT'); if (foundRecords && foundRecords.length > 0) { assert.equal(foundRecords.length, 1, "Найдена настройка пользователя."); foundRecords[0].deleteRecord(); await foundRecords[0].save(); assert.ok(true, "Настройки пользователя удалены из БД."); } else { assert.ok(true, "Настройки пользователя не найдены в БД."); } } catch (error) { assert.ok(false, `Failed to delete user setting: ${error.message}`); } }
27-28: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the analysis of the files, I can now generate the final response:
Modernization needed: Legacy
Ember.setandEmber.runusage foundSeveral test files still use the legacy
Ember.setandEmber.runsyntax, while the file under review has been modernized to use imported functions. Specific files requiring similar modernization:
tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-with-details-test.js: UsesEmber.run()tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-toggler/flexberry-toggler-with-inner-toggler-test.js: UsesEmber.run()tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-lookup/flexberry-lookup-custom-window-test.js: Uses bothEmber.setandEmber.runtests/acceptance/components/flexberry-groupedit/flexberry-groupedit-delete-with-details-test.js: UsesEmber.run()These files should be updated to use the modern syntax:
- Replace
Ember.setwith importedsetfrom@ember/object- Replace
Ember.runwith importedrunfrom@ember/runloop🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Test lifecycle hooks properly configured.
The hooks correctly handle:
- Application controller test mode setup
- User settings service configuration
- Proper cleanup in afterEach
Also applies to: 32-32, 37-38
Let me check the specific usage of
Ember.setandEmber.runin these files to determine if there's an inconsistency pattern.
Let me check if these files have already been modernized in other PRs or if there are any imports at the top of these files that might indicate partial modernization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent usage of modern imports across test files rg -l "Ember\.(set|run)" "tests/acceptance/"Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual usage of Ember.set and Ember.run in the identified files echo "=== folv-delete-with-details-test.js ===" rg "Ember\.(set|run)" tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-with-details-test.js -B 1 -A 1 echo -e "\n=== flexberry-toggler-with-inner-toggler-test.js ===" rg "Ember\.(set|run)" tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-toggler/flexberry-toggler-with-inner-toggler-test.js -B 1 -A 1 echo -e "\n=== flexberry-lookup-custom-window-test.js ===" rg "Ember\.(set|run)" tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-lookup/flexberry-lookup-custom-window-test.js -B 1 -A 1 echo -e "\n=== flexberry-groupedit-delete-with-details-test.js ===" rg "Ember\.(set|run)" tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-groupedit/flexberry-groupedit-delete-with-details-test.js -B 1 -A 1Length of output: 3991
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check imports and the first few lines of the files to understand the current state for file in tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-objectlistview/folv-delete-with-details-test.js \ tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-toggler/flexberry-toggler-with-inner-toggler-test.js \ tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-lookup/flexberry-lookup-custom-window-test.js \ tests/acceptance/components/flexberry-groupedit/flexberry-groupedit-delete-with-details-test.js; do echo "=== $file ===" head -n 20 "$file" echo -e "\n" doneLength of output: 6351
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor