Use longs for swindlers, allowing even bigger swindlers #791
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I hate it but I love it |
|
I did some math and this should allow swindling up to 18 elements. Certain 19-long swindles should also be allowed. (The bottleneck is that the number is a double, so the highest integer you can represent cleanly is 2^53. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1848700/biggest-integer-that-can-be-stored-in-a-double) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
issue observed by cjcool1 in discord. I have no clue what he was doing that needed a swindler of 12+ items but hey it works now