Name emissions constraints to allow for emissions extensions #36
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hellemo
changed the title
hellemo
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2024
We have an issue in EMG, but it would make sense to include one as well in EMB in my opinion. However, the key changes remain in EMG as far as I can see it. |
|
Started the issue #37 to highlight the necessity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current version does not allow changes in the calculation of the total emissions. This leads to issues if one wants to add emissions to, e.g., transmission modes or links as outlined in Issue #9 of EnergyModelsGeography.
As we did not manage to follow up the
approach in time, it is necessary to incorporate the "hacky" solution