Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change nextsw_cday calculation for cam_dev (CAM7) in cplhist mode #229

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

olyson
Copy link
Contributor

@olyson olyson commented May 2, 2023

Description of changes

The radiation re-ordering in cam_dev (CAM7) requires a change to the calculation of nextsw_cday in cplhist mode. This PR introduces a new namelist variable, nextsw_cday_calc, which controls this behavior. The default value is appropriate for cplhist files generated with CAM7. Note that, by default, this namelist flag has no effect on non-cplhist cases (because of the default value of iradsw in non-cplhist cases).

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @billsacks @adamrher

CDEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are there dependencies on other component PRs (if so list):

Are changes expected to change answers (bfb, different to roundoff, more substantial): Greater than roundoff-level changes in cases using datm in CPLHIST mode.

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes): New namelist variable, nextsw_cday_calc.

Testing performed (e.g. aux_cdeps, CESM prealpha, etc):
I have plugged this branch into the latest version of CTSM and ran the following tests:

  • SMS_D_Ld3.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm50BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default - passes and bit-for-bit
  • SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist - passes but changes answers as expected
  • SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist, with the new namelist flag changed to "cam6" - passes and bit-for-bit

Hashes used for testing:
ctsm5.3.009

olyson added 2 commits May 2, 2023 10:59
Note that cplhist_nextsw_cday_calc is intended to be a namelist parameter
but is not yet implemented here.
@billsacks billsacks self-requested a review May 4, 2023 22:06
@billsacks billsacks self-assigned this May 4, 2023
@billsacks
Copy link
Member

This is still on my radar, but other priorities have come up that have prevented me from working on this. I still will work on this, but it may not be until after some vacation and the CESM workshop – so in late June or July.

@wwieder
Copy link

wwieder commented Sep 26, 2024

@billsacks it seems like @olyson may need help with namelist changes associated with this PR? If we're going to start running with CPL_HIST with CESM3 output soon, this should likely be addressed.

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

Yes. Sorry for the continued delay on this. It is coming up to the top of my list.

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

Ack! Things have gotten away from me lately but I'm looking into this now.

@billsacks billsacks marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2024 01:19
Copy link
Member

@billsacks billsacks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack! Finally got to this after way too long of a delay! Sorry!

@olyson and @adamrher thank you for these changes! With the additions I've done here, I'm happy with this myself.

@olyson and/or @adamrher - can one of you please look over my changes - especially the description of the new namelist flag - and let me know if this looks good to you? Once you give your okay, I'll merge it.

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

I have plugged this branch into the latest version of CTSM and ran the following tests:

  • SMS_D_Ld3.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm50BgcCrop.derecho_intel.clm-default - passes and bit-for-bit
  • SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist - passes but changes answers as expected
  • SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist, with the new namelist flag changed to "cam6" - passes and bit-for-bit

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

@olyson and @adamrher - I have also updated the top-level comment in this PR.

@adamrher
Copy link

adamrher commented Nov 4, 2024

@billsacks thanks for circling back to this. The namelist description looks great -- I'm glad that you made it clear that 'cam6' refers to the driver ordering in cam6 physics and earlier physics versions.

@olyson
Copy link
Contributor Author

olyson commented Nov 4, 2024

Thanks for getting back to this. Looks good to me, especially the detailed comments/descriptions.

@billsacks billsacks merged commit f270f58 into ESCOMP:main Nov 5, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants