Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Random net tests #199

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Feb 20, 2021
Merged

Random net tests #199

merged 17 commits into from
Feb 20, 2021

Conversation

akiaei
Copy link

@akiaei akiaei commented Mar 24, 2020

Description

Adding unit testing for the random net functions

Fixes # (issue)
Adds testing for issue #139

Type of change

Additional unit testing

How Has This Been Tested?

just by running the automated unit tests using python3 -m unittest command

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #199 into random will decrease coverage by 1.01%.
The diff coverage is 7.57%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           random     #199      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.04%   81.02%   -1.02%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        1821     1887      +66     
==========================================
+ Hits         1494     1529      +35     
- Misses        327      358      +31     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
neet/landscape.py 98.16% <ø> (ø)
neet/boolean/sensitivity.py 66.11% <7.57%> (-33.89%) ⬇️
neet/boolean/random/constraints.py 62.61% <0.00%> (+28.03%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5bbbd99...3b7a4de. Read the comment docs.

@dglmoore dglmoore merged commit 91d06e5 into ELIFE-ASU:random Feb 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants