Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[java] Enable RASP SSRF tests for some variants #3272

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

smola
Copy link
Member

@smola smola commented Oct 21, 2024

Motivation

APPSEC-54879

Changes

Workflow

  1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
  2. Work on you PR until the CI passes (if something not related to your task is failing, you can ignore it)
  3. Mark it as ready for review
    • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner. We're working on refining the codeowners file quickly.
    • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

  • If PR title starts with [<language>], double-check that only <language> is impacted by the change
  • No system-tests internal is modified. Otherwise, I have the approval from R&P team
  • CI is green, or failing jobs are not related to this change (and you are 100% sure about this statement)
  • A docker base image is modified?
    • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
  • A scenario is added (or removed)?

@smola smola force-pushed the smola/ssrf-spring-boot-rasp branch 2 times, most recently from f43041a to 148e8c3 Compare October 23, 2024 07:44
@smola smola force-pushed the smola/ssrf-spring-boot-rasp branch from 148e8c3 to d3881db Compare October 23, 2024 08:19
@smola smola marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 11:52
@smola smola requested review from a team as code owners October 23, 2024 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant