Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to labeler@v4 #691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

Update to labeler@v4 #691

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023

Conversation

sabiurr
Copy link
Contributor

@sabiurr sabiurr commented Sep 7, 2023

What does this PR do?

Update to labeler@v4. The labeler github action is failing https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-serverless-functions/actions/runs/5807388470/job/16560137170?pr=686

Motivation

The labeler github action is failing https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-serverless-functions/actions/runs/5807388470/job/16560137170?pr=686

Testing Guidelines

Additional Notes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Misc (docs, refactoring, dependency upgrade, etc.)

Check all that apply

  • This PR's description is comprehensive
  • This PR contains breaking changes that are documented in the description
  • This PR introduces new APIs or parameters that are documented and unlikely to change in the foreseeable future
  • This PR impacts documentation, and it has been updated (or a ticket has been logged)
  • This PR's changes are covered by the automated tests
  • This PR collects user input/sensitive content into Datadog
  • This PR passes the integration tests (ask a Datadog member to run the tests)
  • This PR passes the unit tests
  • This PR passes the installation tests (ask a Datadog member to run the tests)

@sabiurr sabiurr merged commit 5711bf9 into master Sep 7, 2023
11 checks passed
@sabiurr sabiurr deleted the update-labeler branch September 7, 2023 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants