-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "revert static quality gates" #33710
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesAdded Jobsstatic_quality_gatesstatic_quality_gates:
allow_failure: true
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/docker_x64$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES
needs:
- artifacts: true
job: agent_deb-x64-a7
- artifacts: true
job: docker_build_agent7
rules:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- when: on_success
script:
- DOCKER_LOGIN=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $DOCKER_REGISTRY_RO user)
|| exit $?
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $DOCKER_REGISTRY_RO token | crane auth
login --username "$DOCKER_LOGIN" --password-stdin "$DOCKER_REGISTRY_URL"
- EXIT="${PIPESTATUS[0]}"; if [ $EXIT -ne 0 ]; then echo "Unable to locate credentials
needs gitlab runner restart"; exit $EXIT; fi
- DATADOG_API_KEY="$("$CI_PROJECT_DIR"/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh "$AGENT_API_KEY_ORG2"
token)" || exit $?; export DATADOG_API_KEY
- export DD_API_KEY="$DATADOG_API_KEY"
- GITHUB_KEY_B64=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP key_b64)
|| exit $?; export GITHUB_KEY_B64
- GITHUB_APP_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP app_id)
|| exit $?; export GITHUB_APP_ID
- GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP
installation_id) || exit $?; export GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID
- echo "Using agent GitHub App"
- inv quality-gates.parse-and-trigger-gates
stage: functional_test
tags:
- arch:amd64 Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Static quality checks ✅Please find below the results from static quality gates Info
|
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 54878632 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 39498dd Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.46 | [-0.31, +1.23] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.17 | [+0.10, +0.24] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.27, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.73, +0.74] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.47, +0.46] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.93, +0.92] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.80, +0.76] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.67, +0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.95, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.93, +0.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.38 | [-0.46, -0.30] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.54 | [-1.41, +0.32] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.58 | [-0.61, -0.55] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.97 | [-1.04, -0.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -2.20 | [-5.21, +0.82] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Fix the issue for python older than 3.12 failing the notify job
Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes