Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#2171: Implement addUserDefinedData function to PhaseManager #2199

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023

Conversation

JacobDomagala
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2171

@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala self-assigned this Oct 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 13, 2023

Pipelines results

PR tests (gcc-12, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, zoltan, json schema test)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (clang-9, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (gcc-10, ubuntu, openmpi, no LB)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (clang-11, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (clang-13, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (clang-12, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (gcc-8, ubuntu, mpich, address sanitizer)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (clang-14, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (clang-10, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich, trace runtime, coverage)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (intel icpc, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log


PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.2, gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for 242e4ed (2023-11-06 23:16:51 UTC)

/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB::collectHandler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB>]"
          detected during:
            instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB::collectHandler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB>]" 
/vt/src/vt/objgroup/proxy/proxy_objgroup.impl.h(154): here
            instantiation of "vt::objgroup::proxy::Proxy<ObjT>::PendingSendType vt::objgroup::proxy::Proxy<ObjT>::reduce<f,Op,Target,Args...>(Target, Args &&...) const [with ObjT=vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB, f=&vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB::collectHandler, Op=vt::collective::PlusOp, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyLB>, Args=<vt::vrt::collection::lb::GreedyPayload>]" 
/vt/src/vt/vrt/collection/balance/greedylb/greedylb.cc(222): here

/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]"
          detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]" 
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(147): here

/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]"
          detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]" 
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(153): here

/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]"
          detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&MyObj::handler, Target=vt::objgroup::proxy::ProxyElm<MyObj>]" 
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(147): here

/vt/src/vt/pipe/pipe_manager.impl.h(133): warning: missing return statement at end of non-void function "vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]"
          detected during instantiation of "auto vt::pipe::PipeManager::makeSend<f,Target>(Target) [with f=&colHan, Target=vt::vrt::collection::VrtElmProxy<MyCol, vt::Index1D>]" 
/vt/examples/callback/callback.cc(153%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0A ==> And there is more. Read log. <==

Build log


@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala force-pushed the 2171-add-user-defined-data branch 4 times, most recently from ce3e9d0 to d54ee9b Compare October 24, 2023 17:02
@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala force-pushed the 2171-add-user-defined-data branch from b5be7fd to cb055a5 Compare October 31, 2023 16:25
@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2023 16:25
@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala force-pushed the 2171-add-user-defined-data branch from cb055a5 to 8dc9607 Compare October 31, 2023 16:26
Copy link
Collaborator

@lifflander lifflander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala force-pushed the 2171-add-user-defined-data branch 2 times, most recently from e15f5de to 4ac5ada Compare November 2, 2023 11:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@nlslatt nlslatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see concern below.

Comment on lines 191 to 194
auto j = std::make_shared<nlohmann::json>();
j->emplace(key, value);

theNodeLBData()->getLBData()->user_per_phase_json_[phase] = j;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this approach limit the user-defined data to a single key-value pair? I think we should allow as much as the application wants to provide.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@JacobDomagala JacobDomagala force-pushed the 2171-add-user-defined-data branch from f28d4c1 to 242e4ed Compare November 6, 2023 23:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@nlslatt nlslatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@nlslatt nlslatt merged commit 09f8bab into develop Nov 7, 2023
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add application-specific information to phase (e.g., timesteps) in JSON output
3 participants