Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix widget number icon #1650

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

Fix widget number icon #1650

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

joanagmaia
Copy link
Contributor

@joanagmaia joanagmaia commented Oct 9, 2023 •
edited by ghost
Loading

Changes proposed ✍️

What

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 695431e

Renamed members to contacts in widget-number component. This aligns the frontend code with the backend API and the UI labels.
​

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 695431e

members no more
contacts match API and UI
widget-number adapts

Why

How

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 695431e

  • Rename members to contacts in widget-number component and related tests (link, F

Checklist ✅

  • Label appropriately with Feature, Improvement, or Bug.
  • Add screehshots to the PR description for relevant FE changes
  • New backend functionality has been unit-tested.
  • API documentation has been updated (if necessary) (see docs on API documentation).
  • Quality standards are met.

@joanagmaia joanagmaia added the Bug Created by Linear-GitHub Sync label Oct 9, 2023
@joanagmaia joanagmaia self-assigned this Oct 9, 2023
@gaspergrom gaspergrom merged commit 1887943 into main Oct 10, 2023
7 checks passed
@gaspergrom gaspergrom deleted the bugfix/widget-number-icon branch October 10, 2023 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gaspergrom gaspergrom gaspergrom approved these changes

Assignees

@joanagmaia joanagmaia

Labels
Bug Created by Linear-GitHub Sync
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@joanagmaia @gaspergrom