make jobscript formatting more uniform #3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- consistenly use "module load" instead of "ml" - consistenly use longform "--cpus-per-task" instead of "-c" - consistenly use "=" in "#SBATCH --parameter=value" - each #SBATCH option on a separate line - indent subsequent lines of a long multi-line command
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've made some systematic edits of the jobscripts (and a few commands) to make the material more uniform and have the style match with what's used in the national docs.
IMO this will make the scripts more readable and avoids confusing the users
who otherwise never use the shortcuts/abbreviations.