Kill footnotes like '{N:001}'

[jonathanrobie]

In each directory, I searched for footnote ids like this:

grep -rl '{N:001}' .

Then I replaced them with sed (using xargs):

grep -rl '{N:001}' . | xargs sed -i 's/{N:001}//g'

I also searched for N:002, but didn't find any.

[jcuenod]

Looks like only 12.[5-9] include this footnote

[rdeblois1960]

Do you have another way to mark footnote callers? Reinier

…

________________________________ From: Jonathan Robie ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 12:01 AM To: Clear-Bible/macula-greek ***@***.***> Cc: Reinier de Blois ***@***.***>; Review requested ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [Clear-Bible/macula-greek] Kill footnotes like '{N:001}' (PR #91) @jonathanrobie<https://github.com/jonathanrobie> requested your review on: #91<#91> Kill footnotes like '{N:001}'. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#91 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJQ2NP3FSTTG5H34PAVLU3ZHDALPAVCNFSM6AAAAABJHF5D5CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJTGEZTOOBVGE4TONY>. You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- This email and any attachments are confidential and intended only for those to which it is addressed. If you have received this message in error please inform the sender and delete the email. The content of this message belongs to the sender and the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of United Bible Societies. United Bible Societies Association, a company limited by guarantee. Registered in England and Wales No 2264875. Registered Charity No 800058 Registered Office: Stonehill Green, Westlea, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN5 7PJ, England.

[jonathanrobie]

Do you have another way to mark footnote callers? Reinier

Should footnote callers be invoked from these attributes in the Macula trees and TSVs? @RickBrannan ?

[jonathanrobie]

Looks like only 12.[5-9] include this footnote

Yes, I think that's right.

[RickBrannan]

Should footnote callers be invoked from these attributes in the Macula trees and TSVs? @RickBrannan ?

I don't think that Macula trees/TSVs should include the callers to the notes.

[RickBrannan]

I agree that removing the {N:\d+} notation is appropriate for inclusion of the data in Macula. The lexicon itself should include and utilize such data, but I don't think it necessary for Macula.