Update MSH-9 for OML messages to be consistent with the HL7 spec #1300
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-Authored-By: Basilio Bogado <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Basilio Bogado <[email protected]>
|
basiliskus
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2024
2 tasks
tjohnson7021
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
* Update MSH-9 for OML messages to be consistent with the HL7 spec * update unit test to check for correct OML event coding --------- Co-authored-by: Basilio Bogado <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update MSH-9 for OML messages to be consistent with the HL7 spec
While working on the RS integration tests, we noticed that our existing hl7 OML messages couldn't be parsed because MSH-9 was the wrong format. This PR updates the OML mapping to use the right format for MSH-9
Issue
#1255
Checklist
Note: You may remove items that are not applicable