Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Be consistent on notation for packages #135

Closed
athowes opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Be consistent on notation for packages #135

athowes opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
good starter issue Could be nice to get up to speed with codebase

Comments

@athowes
Copy link
Collaborator

athowes commented Dec 19, 2024

I see:

  • {EpiNow2}
  • {EpiNow2}
  • EpiNow2

My preference is EpiNow2 (which is nowhere perhaps) but I don't mind as long as it's consistent here.

@athowes athowes added the good starter issue Could be nice to get up to speed with codebase label Dec 19, 2024
@athowes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

athowes commented Dec 20, 2024

@zsusswein what is your preference?

@zsusswein
Copy link
Collaborator

@zsusswein
Copy link
Collaborator

But if you're willing to put in the work to go through and standardize style everywhere, you can pick your preference because you're the one doing it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good starter issue Could be nice to get up to speed with codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants