-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 979
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat[webapp][breakpoints]: ENG-7984 Add another breakpoint #3856
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 29edb4a.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
@@ -181,7 +181,15 @@ export class BuilderBlock extends React.Component< | |||
const reversedNames = sizeNames.slice().reverse(); | |||
const styles: any = {}; | |||
if (responsiveStyles) { | |||
const contentHasXSmallBreakpoint = Boolean( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: we could avoid this flag and the check in the for loop later. That way we will treat xsmall as existing medium or small sizes.
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ const sizes = { | |||
max: 991, | |||
}, | |||
large: { | |||
min: 990, | |||
default: 991, | |||
min: 992, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the default large
having bigger implications, we should avoid this change for now.
Description
xsmall
breakpoints for gen1 react sdkLink to JIRA ticket:
https://builder-io.atlassian.net/browse/ENG-7984
Loom
https://www.loom.com/share/f5f262080f7040f89eb976c5066dd237