Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: ion checkbox using styled-components #141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

danilo-moreira-brisa
Copy link
Contributor

@danilo-moreira-brisa danilo-moreira-brisa commented Apr 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the Checkbox component to enhance performance and visual appeal.
    • Improved Checkbox component styling for a more intuitive user experience.
  • Tests
    • Enhanced Checkbox tests for better reliability and coverage.

@danilo-moreira-brisa danilo-moreira-brisa self-assigned this Apr 8, 2024
@danilo-moreira-brisa danilo-moreira-brisa linked an issue Apr 8, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve a significant refactor of the checkbox component, transitioning to the use of styled-components for styling, enhancing the structure, imports, and the overall aesthetic of the component. This includes a utility function for theme rendering in tests, reordering imports in stories, and updating styles to ensure a modern, clean look.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../checkbox/checkbox.test.tsx, .../checkbox/checkbox.tsx Updated imports, structures, and introduced theme utility function in tests.
.../checkbox/styles.tsx Refactored to use styled-components; updated styling.
.../checkbox/checkbox.stories.tsx Reordered and changed imports; added id to WithLabel.

Possibly related issues

  • Issue refactor: checkbox #128: The refactor of the checkbox to use styled-components directly aligns with this issue's objective to modernize and enhance the component styling using styled-components.

🐰✨
Changes here, changes there,
A checkbox refactored with care.
With styled-components, it's flair,
Now looking sleek, beyond compare.
Hop, hop, hurray, in the software lair!
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64b0015 and aa3b695.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/components/checkbox/checkbox.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/checkbox/checkbox.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/checkbox/styles.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/stories/checkbox/checkbox.stories.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
src/stories/checkbox/checkbox.stories.tsx (2)

1-3: Reordering imports improves readability and consistency.


35-36: Adding an id attribute enhances accessibility and can be useful for testing or styling purposes. Good practice.

src/components/checkbox/checkbox.tsx (3)

1-8: Using InputHTMLAttributes for props enhances type safety and ensures compatibility with standard HTML input attributes. Good practice.


2-2: Introduction of Checkbox, CheckboxContainer, and Label styled components aligns with the goal of using styled-components. Promotes modularity and maintainability.


24-35: Adjustments in rendering logic to accommodate new styled components are correctly implemented, maintaining the component's functionality.

src/components/checkbox/checkbox.test.tsx (3)

1-3: Reordering imports improves readability and consistency.


10-10: Updating the testing library render method to use renderWithTheme ensures components are rendered within the correct theme context. Good practice for styled-components.


2-2: Introduction of the renderWithTheme utility function is necessary for testing components styled with styled-components. Good addition.

src/components/checkbox/styles.tsx (3)

3-11: Refactoring the checked icon background styling using styled-components and dynamic color encoding allows for flexible styling based on theme colors. Clever approach.


19-72: Adjustments to the checkbox styles using styled-components are well-implemented, leveraging theme-based styling and CSS attributes to enhance appearance and interactivity.


74-83: Update to the label styling using styled-components ensures that the label's appearance is in line with the theme and responds appropriately when the checkbox is disabled.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa3b695 and 4db4b37.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/checkbox/checkbox.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/components/checkbox/checkbox.tsx

@danilo-moreira-brisa danilo-moreira-brisa merged commit d4ad008 into main Apr 17, 2024
6 checks passed
@danilo-moreira-brisa danilo-moreira-brisa deleted the refactor-checkbox-128 branch April 17, 2024 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

refactor: checkbox
2 participants