Solomon2022 #690
Solomon2022 #690
Conversation
new/LIT6557Mashafat.xml
Outdated
| <teiHeader> | ||
| <fileDesc> | ||
| <titleStmt> | ||
| <title xml:lang="gez" xml:id="t1">Maṣḥafa tārik</title> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you also add the title in fidal?
new/LIT6557Mashafat.xml
Outdated
| </teiHeader> | ||
| <text> | ||
| <body> | ||
| <div type="bibliography"/><!----> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be good to add at least the incipit and explicit, and possibly an abstract briefly summarising the content. And in the case of this lengthy work, maybe some subdivision into the major parts (if they can be identified) might also be useful. The normal users of BM will not have access to the manuscript description for a long time, so any information that disambiguates this work will be very useful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, Dorothea!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also bibliography might be of help, with the tag of a specific reference taken from the zotero database.
For any suggestion, you can look at the guidelines (https://betamasaheft.eu/Guidelines/?id=works) or at some of the latest work records in the database.
| @@ -49,7 +54,30 @@ type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?> | |||
| </teiHeader> | |||
| <text> | |||
| <body> | |||
| <div type="bibliography"/><!----> | |||
| <div type="edition"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that there are a few small problems here with the nesting of textparts. Do I understand it correctly, that the text is divided in the parts "Genealogyofkings", "GenealogyofMary", "GenealogyofEthiopiankings", and "LIT6568YanagastatKebr", and that you give the incipit for each of these textparts? If so, each of these textparts should be their own <div type="textpart"> and then contain a further <div type="textpart" subtype="incipit"> in which the incipit should be encoded. But maybe I misunderstood.
| <profileDesc> | ||
| <creation/> | ||
| <abstract> | ||
| <p/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that a small description in the abstract, or some indication in the edition on the textparts would be very helpful. For instance, I would wonder immediately whether this work is a translation of Kəbra nagaśt or another work?
|
it would be nice if work records when created are also merged for everyone to know that they are there, could you please finalize the PR? thank you! |
|
I will continue to work on this. |
|
I have continued to look into this, and decided that a detailed description of all subparts - difficult to distinguish in the manuscript - would take too much time at this point. It might be an interesting topic for further research. For the purposes of cataloguing, I would propose the minimalist description present now. (I have kept the subparts that had already been started, because they are not wrong, but commented them out) |
|
@thea-m can you maybe fix the conflicts and merge this? thank you |
|
If it's alright, I will deal with this when I come back in December :) |
No description provided.