Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SHA-244 Remove copy git branch shortcut #534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

JensAstrup
Copy link
Member

@JensAstrup JensAstrup commented Nov 30, 2024

What's Changed

  • Removed the keyboard shortcut for copying a git branch name, and moving to in development

Tested

  • View and Interact with Todoist buttons
    • View Story page with Todoist disabled
  • Use both analyze and break down AI features
    • With proxy
    • Without proxy
  • View development time for in progress stories
    • On page load
    • On SPA navigation
  • View cycle time on a completed story
    • On page load
    • On SPA navigation
  • Add notes to a story

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • No new features added in this release.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated functionalities related to copying Git branches, simplifying user interactions.
  • Chores

    • Removed keyboard shortcuts for copying Git branches, reducing clutter in shortcut options.
    • Updated documentation to reflect the removal of specific commands and functionalities.
  • Tests

    • Removed tests related to the deleted Git branch copying functions, streamlining the test suite.

Copy link

linear bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the removal of several functionalities related to Git branch operations from the codebase. Specifically, the copyGitBranch function and its associated handling in various scripts have been deleted, including related keyboard shortcuts and test cases. This results in the elimination of the ability to copy the current Git branch name and transition to a development state. The modifications simplify the control flow and reduce the number of predefined keyboard shortcuts within the extension.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/js/content-scripts.ts Removed import and handling of copyGitBranch in handleMessage.
src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-branch-move-to-in-development.ts Deleted file containing copyBranchAndMoveToInDevelopment function.
src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-git-branch.ts Deleted file containing copyGitBranch function.
src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/keyboard-shortcuts.ts Removed keyboard shortcuts for copyGitBranch and copyBranchAndMoveToInDevelopment.
src/js/service-worker/handlers.ts Removed handling of the command copy-git-branch in handleCommands.
src/manifest.json Removed command entries for copy-git-branch and copy-git-branch-and-update.
src/manifest.template.json Removed command entries for copy-git-branch and copy-git-branch-and-update.
tests/content-scripts.test.ts Removed mock and test case for copyGitBranch.
tests/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-branch-move-in-development.test.ts Deleted file containing tests for copyBranchAndMoveToInDevelopment.
tests/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-git-branch.test.ts Deleted file containing tests for copyGitBranch.
tests/service-worker/handlers.test.ts Cosmetic changes to formatting; no functional changes.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ability to copy a branch name is broken (SHA-244) The removal of copyGitBranch functionality breaks the ability to copy a branch name.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95aeaac and 8cf2ae5.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • src/js/content-scripts.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-branch-move-to-in-development.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-git-branch.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/keyboard-shortcuts.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/js/service-worker/handlers.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/manifest.json (0 hunks)
  • src/manifest.template.json (0 hunks)
  • tests/content-scripts.test.ts (0 hunks)
  • tests/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-branch-move-in-development.test.ts (0 hunks)
  • tests/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-git-branch.test.ts (0 hunks)
  • tests/service-worker/handlers.test.ts (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (10)
  • src/js/content-scripts.ts
  • src/manifest.template.json
  • src/manifest.json
  • tests/content-scripts.test.ts
  • src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/keyboard-shortcuts.ts
  • src/js/service-worker/handlers.ts
  • src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-git-branch.ts
  • src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-branch-move-to-in-development.ts
  • tests/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-git-branch.test.ts
  • tests/keyboard-shortcuts/copy-branch-move-in-development.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/service-worker/handlers.test.ts (4)

16-16: LGTM!

The Chrome API mock setup is correctly implemented.


35-35: LGTM!

The error handling test case is properly implemented.


Line range hint 1-67: Verify test coverage for remaining commands

While the removal of the git branch command is appropriate, please ensure that the test coverage for the remaining commands (change-state and change-iteration) is comprehensive.

Let's check the test coverage:

✅ Verification successful

Test coverage for remaining commands is comprehensive

The test coverage for change-state and change-iteration commands is well-maintained across multiple test files:

  • tests/service-worker/handlers.test.ts: Tests the command handling and message sending
  • tests/content-scripts.test.ts: Verifies message handling and function invocation
  • tests/keyboard-shortcuts/change-state.test.ts and tests/keyboard-shortcuts/change-iteration.test.ts: Tests the actual implementation of these commands
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for remaining commands

# Search for all usages of the remaining commands to ensure they're properly tested
rg -A 5 "change-state|change-iteration"

Length of output: 7967


61-65: Verify the command list modification

The reduction in command list aligns with the PR objective of removing the git branch copy functionality.

Let's verify that only the git branch related command was removed:

✅ Verification successful

Command list modification is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that:

  1. The handleCommands implementation in src/js/service-worker/handlers.ts only handles 'change-state' and 'change-iteration' commands
  2. The test modification correctly reflects this by removing 'copy-git-branch' from the command list
  3. No references to 'copy-git-branch' remain in the TypeScript codebase
  4. The change aligns with the PR objective of removing git branch copy functionality
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any references to git branch commands in the codebase
# to ensure complete removal and no unintended command removals

# Search for any remaining git branch related commands
rg -i "git.*branch|copy.*branch|branch.*copy"

# Search for the command handler implementation to verify the complete command list
ast-grep --pattern 'handleCommands = async (command: string)' -A 10

Length of output: 409


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the command handler implementation with a different pattern
# and check the git history for the removed command

# Search for command handler in TypeScript files
rg -t ts "handleCommands.*command.*=>" -A 10

# Search for command-related test files to see previous versions
git diff HEAD~1 tests/service-worker/handlers.test.ts

Length of output: 1793


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the actual handler implementation to ensure complete removal
rg -t ts "handleCommands" -A 10 src/

# Also check for any remaining references to copy-git-branch in the source code
rg -t ts "copy-git-branch"

Length of output: 2371


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@JensAstrup JensAstrup merged commit d3d4c04 into develop Nov 30, 2024
6 checks passed
@JensAstrup JensAstrup deleted the sha-244-git-branch-functionality-broken branch November 30, 2024 05:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant