3.7.0

[JensAstrup]

What's Changed

-Remove Sentry from build until a remotely hosted script can be successfully excluded in order to conform to the Chrome Web Store's new policies

• Update various dependencies

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to d581d96 in 40 seconds

More details

• Looked at 1044 lines of code in 24 files
• Skipped 2 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 8 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. src/js/ai/call-openai.ts:16

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

2. src/js/analyze/ai-functions.ts:62

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately. This applies to other similar instances in this file.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

3. src/js/keyboard-shortcuts/keyboard-shortcuts.ts:106

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

4. src/js/popup/popup.ts:47

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately. This applies to other similar instances in this file.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

5. src/js/service-worker/listeners.ts:37

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

6. src/js/service-worker/omnibox/listeners.ts:14

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

7. src/js/service-worker/on-install-and-update.ts:39

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

8. src/js/service-worker/slug-manager.ts:37

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a more robust error handling mechanism here, as the removal of Sentry might lead to loss of error tracking. Ensure that errors are logged or handled appropriately.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The PR removes Sentry from the build, which is reflected in the removal of Sentry-related imports and error handling. However, the error handling logic should be reviewed to ensure that errors are still logged appropriately.

Workflow ID: wflow_z070RSedfCPePDXF

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.