Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding board definitions for #89 #123

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Doom4535
Copy link

@Doom4535 Doom4535 commented May 29, 2019

Highlights

Added entries for additional boards in #89:

  • Nano (technically v3, v2.x looks to have used the atmega168)
  • Mega1280
  • Adafruit Grand Central M4 Express

Issues Fixed

Changed processor used for Arduino due from atmega/avr to atmel sam

Notes

  • No action has been taken as of yet to expose additional analog pins on Nano
  • No action has been take to expose additional features of the Grand Central beyond the standard M4 at this time

Added entry for Arduino mega1280 boards
Added additional board entries, change due uC
@Doom4535
Copy link
Author

Welp, this is what I get for thinking these changes could be made from mobile only.

@Doom4535 Doom4535 closed this May 29, 2019
@ianfixes
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks like a good start. Don't be too concerned about the compiler errors, this simply means that we need to do some intelligent mocking out of defines, possibly in cpp/arduino/ArduinoDefines.h.

The most ominous warning (about device type not defined) is coming direction from avr/io.h, where I don't see __AVR_ATSAM3X8E__ listed.

Could it be that I'm using an outdated set of library files from the Arduino library (io.h in particular)?

@ianfixes
Copy link
Collaborator

Reposting on #124 which seems to be a duplicate/repeat of this issue.

@ianfixes ianfixes changed the title Adding additional board definitions for #89 Adding board definitions for #89 May 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants