You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Also, it seems that the workflow always wants the -r version flag. If you try to run without one, it fails with the error:
Project `AlexsLemonade/scpca-nf` is currently stickied on revision: v0.7.2 -- you need to explicitly specify a revision with the option `-r` in order to use it
This error is not an always error. It has to do with what the last pulled version was. If you run nextflow pull without -r you should get the latest version and then be able to run it just fine. Which is to say that -r is not always required, but it is a often good idea.
Rather than adding -r everywhere, maybe we add a "troubleshooting" section? I would say if you see that error, try nextflow pull AlexsLemonade/scpca-nf to get the latest release, then try again. In general, I would rather have external users use the latest version unless they have a reason to stick with an old one.
Just noting this original issue here. Although I don't know if any of the things from the original issue really need to be addressed anymore so I'm going to close the old one.
Rather than adding
-r
everywhere, maybe we add a "troubleshooting" section? I would say if you see that error, trynextflow pull AlexsLemonade/scpca-nf
to get the latest release, then try again. In general, I would rather have external users use the latest version unless they have a reason to stick with an old one.Originally posted by @jashapiro in #688 (comment)
As quoted above, we may want a troubleshooting section which includes the "error" that users may encounter if they don't provide
-r
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: