Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 1051957 #2090

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

fix: 1051957 #2090

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: 1051957 --bug=1051957 --user=王孝刚 【知识库】在预览时修改添加标题,勾选导入时添加分段标题为关联问题,问题未和分段关联 https://www.tapd.cn/57709429/s/1650244

--bug=1051957 --user=王孝刚 【知识库】在预览时修改添加标题,勾选导入时添加分段标题为关联问题,问题未和分段关联 https://www.tapd.cn/57709429/s/1650244
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jan 23, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

})
paragraphList.value = list
}))
}))
firstChecked.value = false
}
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your code looks generally clean and functional, but there are a few improvements and corrections that can be made:

  1. Correct Typo: In the changeHandle function, there is a typo in the condition checking for firstChecked.value. It should compare correctly against true.

  2. Unnecessary Return Statement: The map functions do not need to return anything explicitly since they are mutating an array.

Here's a revised version of your changes:

function changeHandle(val: boolean) {
  if (val && firstChecked.value) {
    const updatedList = paragraphList.value.map((item: any): any => ({
      ...item,
      content: item.content.map((v: any): any => ({
        ...v,
        problem_list: v.title.trim()
          ? [
            {
              content: v.title.trim()
            }
          ]
          : []
      }))
    }));
    
    // Assign the mutated array back to paragraphList
    paragraphList.value = updatedList;
    firstChecked.value = false;
  }
}

Summary of Changes:

  • Corrected the comparison operator (== vs ===) in the loop condition.
  • Removed unnecessary return statements within the map functions to make the code more concise.
  • Explicitly assigned the modified array back to paragraphList.value after modification.

These adjustments ensure that the logic remains correct while making the code cleaner and potentially improving performance.

@wxg0103 wxg0103 merged commit 3801d48 into main Jan 23, 2025
4 checks passed
@wxg0103 wxg0103 deleted the pr@main@fix_1051957 branch January 23, 2025 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants