Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bl:Books shouldn't be plural #9

Open
uogbuji opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

bl:Books shouldn't be plural #9

uogbuji opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@uogbuji
Copy link
Contributor

uogbuji commented Mar 2, 2016

re: http://bibfra.me/view/library/marc/Books

Sure MARC says "Books" for that data type, but that should have nothing to do with BIBFRAME Lite. This should be http://bibfra.me/view/library/marc/Book

cc @erimille @informaticmonad

@distobj
Copy link

distobj commented Mar 2, 2016

I agree that Book > Books, but while working on marcextra.py always considered the MARC vocabulary to be authoritative for term names under http://bibfra.me/vocab/marc/ , while BIBFRAME Lite was only that vocabulary under http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/

@uogbuji
Copy link
Contributor Author

uogbuji commented Mar 2, 2016

Agreed
On Mar 2, 2016 9:47 AM, "Mark Baker" [email protected] wrote:

I agree that Book > Books, but while working on marcextra.py always
considered the MARC vocabulary to be authoritative for term names under
http://bibfra.me/vocab/marc/ , while BIBFRAME Lite was only that
vocabulary under http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants